See Bluebird Is Taken Over

This forum is intended for the discussion and sharing of information on the topic of British born and British-based female performers in hard-core adult films and related matters.
awgazzm69
Posts: 73
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: See Bluebird Is Taken Over

Post by awgazzm69 »

it was always shit anyway i dunno why anybody even talks about them all hot air and bollux the lot of em
bgafdfan
Posts: 898
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

new newbies

Post by bgafdfan »

you missed 2..?




mybeautifultease
Posts: 178
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: See Bluebird Is Taken Over

Post by mybeautifultease »

I've seen probably their biggest blockbusters that were hyped to hell; Bonny and Clide and Bat Fxxx, must say they are very well produced and inspiring in that sense but as a porn film I wasn't that rocked.

Vivid's Batman was a better attempt if not as well produced.

I hope Bluebird manage to turn its misfortune around, if in deed it is in misfortune.

Kind Regards
Ben

t: twitter.com/pervlens
w: www.pervlens.com
w: www.mybeautifultease.com
RichfetisH
Posts: 1626
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Chloe Cruize:

Post by RichfetisH »

www.richfetish.com
one eyed jack
Posts: 12410
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: See Bluebird Is Taken Over

Post by one eyed jack »

MBT wrote:

..as a porn film I wasn't that rocked.


This was the core of what i said when everyone was banging the drum for what a great trailer it was.

It was.

Thing is, as a porn film I'd like the sex to match the scope of the film and take priority over it. Not to be the background to it.

I havent seen the movie but while I think the trailer is great, unfortunately its like Play Boy...coffee table porn thats nice to look at but you can't bang one out to.

www.realcouples.com
www.onemanbanned.com
www.linkmojo.me/realcouples
www.twitter.com/realcouples
www.facebook.com/realcouples
jj
Posts: 28236
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: See Bluebird Is Taken Over

Post by jj »

I've seen them and they have two major flaws: too many close-ups [at the
expense of full-body shots], and too many scenes are multi-performer- the dog
can't see the rabbit for more than a few seconds at a time.
B+C was a bit of a letdown after all the hype- and Nat only has two main scenes.

"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
Post Reply