Re: Brit vs. US porn - why are they nastier?
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 8:17 am
Another thought about the difference between UK and US porn....
We don't have the money to make productions as well as they do over the pond. Most of the UK producers are self funded, but UK producers can make the most amazing films if they do have funding.
I saw Kenny Rye's "Stiletto" this week. It is the most amazing piece of erotica.. Yes erotica not porn I've ever seen. Here's a comment from a friend who has also watched it "I tell you what its a bit high quality for a british product wouldnt you say?"
There is no "Suck this bitch"... No "F**k me up my arse"... No chat from the cameraman.... The settings, camera work, editing and music make it look like a 70's Italian art movie.
The reason being, we have the models and we have the producers who are talented enough. We just don't have the funding. Stiletto is through Private which shows what can be done... Give us the money and we'll produce the goods
We don't have the money to make productions as well as they do over the pond. Most of the UK producers are self funded, but UK producers can make the most amazing films if they do have funding.
I saw Kenny Rye's "Stiletto" this week. It is the most amazing piece of erotica.. Yes erotica not porn I've ever seen. Here's a comment from a friend who has also watched it "I tell you what its a bit high quality for a british product wouldnt you say?"
There is no "Suck this bitch"... No "F**k me up my arse"... No chat from the cameraman.... The settings, camera work, editing and music make it look like a 70's Italian art movie.
The reason being, we have the models and we have the producers who are talented enough. We just don't have the funding. Stiletto is through Private which shows what can be done... Give us the money and we'll produce the goods