Page 6 of 6

Re: Modelling Rates

Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 5:09 pm
by jojo69
hi, i have to agree with you on this,content is content which ive said before,
jojo xxx

Re: Modelling Rates

Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 8:21 pm
by nikonman
Cate,
At least the topic as created a large amount of discussion.

The reason i started the thread in the first place was because a couple of models from the Purestorm site were asking such high rates for glamour/topless only, and wondered what the going rates were for 2009
Both girls were way out of my price range.

Also, i hope you are keeping well and very busy.

Ps.
After reading something in the newspaper i might start a new thread later on in the week, but think it might have to go on the other forum.

Re: Modelling Rates

Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2009 12:05 pm
by sparky
**Be-Seen-Here why do you appear to be anti amateur photographers who want to book a model but do not want publish or sell the photographs / video ?**

(I'm not, I'm anti gonzo amateur making out he's doing it for his website when the website/cam is just a front, he's just after a shag really)


Thanks for clarifying it is only amateurs appearing to book a model wanting to shoot for a website that does not actually exist that you are against - and I agree with you.


Re: Modelling Rates

Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2009 12:23 pm
by sparky
Although i don't do video myself, i understand that an extra ?10 is added on to the stills rate for video.

Yes that is what most girls who offer video quote.

I have always assumed it is because they see it as more demanding work.
A girl who can do great poses for stills can not always give a flowing video scene.