egafd.com

Randy Andy,

You say: "Not sure how being against someone who wants to shag kids and posting replies to comments on the subject turns things into a witch hunt but as mentioned I go with the mods decision."

You attempt to brand me a paedophile but it won't work and you are a liar because I have never said that I want to "shag kids" and you know it you reprobate.

I am afraid that if I ever met you it would be a case of pistols or swords at dawn on Hampstead Heath you scoundrel!

Mike Freeman.

JB: You say "
"But I really don't follow the reasoning at all. A rape can be carried out under the verbal or implied threat of violence, using blackmail or where a person has a great psychological hold over their victim. It can be carried out simply because the victim is frightened of what might happen if they resist. This can mean that no violence is used, and possibly no major law is broken - except the law against rape."


I have said "Certain people have suggested that if we scrap sexual offences this would allow people to persuade children to have sex without the use of violence. Of course this is erroneous because the law already regards such acts as ?attacks? and they would be dealt with under the laws of assault and actual bodily harm."

Mike Freeman.

Anyone who will lmao :@)

Deuce Bigolo,

Wrote:"An exercise in semantics given that you can re-badge & re-write a law and change nothing because it still comes down to Her word against His or vice versa in court."

Yes although one can rape a female without leaving marks of violence. Two black eyes for example or some strangulation marks would offer proof of guilt.

Mike Freeman.