The Bang Babes an' all that

[Trumpton]

If current or former members of this forum wish to set up another forum so be it - I couldn't give a toss. I did take a peek at the Huffers and noticed that Fudgey is a member - I wondered where he'd gone. !wink!

I do miss old Maggs and his ramblings - I hope, somehow, he'll come back here again?

[colonel]

The nameless one has been dealt with...although you and Sam seem fit to continue to associate with him, Caradog....it is the ones who remain on here spouting such bile that need our tender mercies- and I say our, because I expect you to take the lead, given that you are so proactive against them on here.

BTW, I am both humbled and chuffed that the other place is driven now by the nameless one- just one of the Moderators, we are told- writing what he thinks of me and a defence of over there. And he accuses me of being homosexual!

So, Caradog, he is now using over there to bully, harrass and make homophobic remarks against many posters on here! And yet you have still not managed to delete them and deal with him? Maybe you and Sam should do that before you criticise me on here again?

The other place intimates that Jacques has my IP address! Big Brother is certainly watching, isn't he?

So, to add to what randyandy has said, we have a self-selecting elitist 'forum' that seeks to knock this place and the Mods, and be homophobic, harassing and invading people's privacy. I'm glad a few of us will just point out to potential recruits just what it stands for.

As a progressive democratic socialist, there is no way I can join such bullying elitism.

[colonel]

Trumpy, where have you been? Please post more often- we need you and this Forum needs you...common sense in crazy times!

[Sam Slater]

Bullying? Homophobia?

Please quote.

Oh....and you made no retort concerning the general tolerance of bigotry compared to the intolerance of WZR.

[colonel]

Sam,

The bullying and homophobia can be found posted by the nameless one at the other place.

Yes, some people on here can be guilty of what you call 'bigotry'. And yes, the nameless one is an intolerant bigot. And your point is?

I see no comments from you on either the Big Brother aspect of the other place regarding members of this Forum; or of the failure to moderate the more bigoted and homophobic outpourings of the other place in a professional manner.

[Sam Slater]

[quote]The bullying and homophobia can be found posted by the nameless one at the other place.[/quote]

I specifically asked you to quote anything of that nature because I can't find anything of the sort. Can you quote please?

[quote]Yes, some people on here can be guilty of what you call 'bigotry'. And yes, the nameless one is an intolerant bigot. And your point is?[/quote]

My point? I thought my questions were pretty clear. I didn't ask if anyone was guilty of bigotry in my last post, nor did I ask you if you thought Wazza was a bigot; I asked you: "Why was my pedantry an issue on a tediously long thread, but the complete, in your face racism, was left unreproved? Is/was Wazza's attitude, on here, really worse than blatant racism?"

So....?

[quote]I see no comments from you on either the Big Brother aspect of the other place regarding members of this Forum[/quote]

'Big Brother aspect?' Can you elaborate more?

[colonel]

Now now, Sam,

> [quote]The bullying and homophobia can be found posted by the
> nameless one at the other place.[/quote]
>
> I specifically asked you to quote anything of that nature
> because I can't find anything of the sort. Can you quote
> please?

Read the site you yourself purport to moderate. I won't advertise it here. Do you moderate it, Sam?

>
> [quote]Yes, some people on here can be guilty of what you call
> 'bigotry'. And yes, the nameless one is an intolerant bigot.
> And your point is?[/quote]
>
> My point? I thought my questions were pretty clear. I didn't
> ask if anyone was guilty of bigotry in my last post, nor did I
> ask you if you thought Wazza was a bigot; I asked you: "Why
> was my pedantry an issue on a tediously long thread, but the
> complete, in your face racism, was left unreproved? Is/was
> Wazza's attitude, on here, really worse than blatant
> racism?"
>
> So....?

The nameless one's attitude is as bad as blatent racism, Sam. Why don't you use your energies to oppose and campaign against racist outbursts on here, Sam?

>
> [quote]I see no comments from you on either the Big Brother
> aspect of the other place regarding members of this
> Forum[/quote]
>
> 'Big Brother aspect?' Can you elaborate more?

The nameless one has mentioned in the other place that Jacques takes down IP addresses of posters- though whether all of them or just the ones that he disagrees with is unsure.

46 minutes to reply to my posts, Sam. Is that how long it takes to read them out to the nameless one down the telephone line?

Work with me and others to fight racism and sexism on this Forum, Sam. And maybe you could work into your posts why you apparently cannot moderate attacks from another place. Despite you being a moderator.

This is the best entertainment going.

[randyandy]

Sam Slater wrote:

> As for the e-mails: I think randyandy will have to send his
> thanks to Jacques and huffers. When Wazza read the defamatory
> posts on here, the only way he could retort was via e-mail.
> Since the huffers now have a public forum for anyone to peruse,
> Wazza -I'm guessing- has stopped e-mailing his rivals and uses
> the forum as his soap box: problemo solved.
>

Last post on this nonsense from me:

Actually Sam as you probably well know the great one was emailing direct and posting on the forum saying look at me aren't I clever for doing it at the same time.

As for stopping the emails I am not sure the great one was added to my spam box and a compliant was logged to yahoo asking if they would block him.

IT may try again, I don't know and care even less it will be ignored and deleted if it gets through coincidently I'd recommend doing the ignoring for those who post The Bang Babes an' all that threads.

[Sam Slater]

[quote]Read the site you yourself purport to moderate. I won't advertise it here. Do you moderate it, Sam?[/quote]

I've never implied that I moderate huffers, colonel; I've not moderated anybody's posts as there's never been a need to (this will change if you can point me to the supposed offensive posts - but you seem averse to doing so).

[quote]The nameless one's attitude is as bad as blatent racism, Sam.[/quote]

Really? Can you find something WZR has said in the past, on here or huffers, that's 'as bad as racism'? I mean, that's a pretty big thing to charge a guy with without some quotes to back you up; and I know you're not one of those dumb posters that say daft things without plenty of incriminating material that will carry you to victory.

[quote]Why don't you use your energies to oppose and campaign against racist outbursts on here, Sam?[/quote]

I have; and even quite recently. Please take note on how many have been laying into Wazza, recently, compared to the 'eager masses' condemning Alice's comments regarding Jews, Luvvies and Arabs.

[quote]The nameless one has mentioned in the other place that Jacques takes down IP addresses of posters- though whether all of them or just the ones that he disagrees with is unsure.[/quote]

Lol...That's just the site stats, which do this automatically for nearly every site on the net. How do you think the mods here find out when a banned poster reappears with a different username and e-mail address? Monsieur isn't sat there, hacking away, trying to find out what colour undies you have on, or controlling your webcam.

[quote]46 minutes to reply to my posts, Sam. Is that how long it takes to read them out to the nameless one down the telephone line?[/quote]

Oh no, not you as well! Did you know that Alice accused me of letting Wazza use my PC to log in under my username, just to post? Paranoia is something we only ever used to accuse Mike Freeman of; it seems it's catching around here. In reality, I took a crap, got myself a glass of milk and sat reading a chapter of 'The Count of Monte Cristo' (Chapter LXXXVIII to be exact: Where M. Albert de Morcerf challenges the count to a duel while at the opera. Pistols at 8am in the Bois de Vincennes apparently. Please excuse me if the next chapter delays my next reply; no doubt I'll be congratulating you on finding the proof that Wazza is indeed a homophobe, or his past attitude really is as bad as racism.)

[Sam Slater]

I have no idea when Wazza stopped e-mailing you, andy, but I'd hazard a guess that he stopped at, or not long after the public forum on huffers went live.

Only Wazza and yourself can know for sure, so I'd check that spam box and find out.