Page 6 of 11

Re: Was 9/11 an inside job by the White House ?

Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 3:10 pm
by mrmcfister
Nando Rick,
Dont talk nonsense.Theres a conspiracy.You said the truth.Or was it JFK what wrote it from the grave...if he's dead that is ..which I doubt cos JFK wasnt in Dallas at the time he was in Saundersfoot having a lemon meringue ice cream.At least thats what John Prestcott told me..at least I thought it was him..some fat bloke on the telly anyway...or am I getting a bit confused....no I'm right and everyone else is wrong..think I'll write a book...blimmmlmmblmmll..bibbleblim....

Re: Was 9/11 an inside job by the White House ?

Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 3:11 pm
by one eyed jack
I think a lot of the theories people come up with would make an excellent premise for Die Hard 4...Get in touch with the Fox execs there...They may be interested


Re: Was 9/11 an inside job by the White House ?

Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 3:16 pm
by NandoRick
Hahahaha dude wtf, have you been on the whiskey :D

mate i got some news to for you, make sure your sitting down.

[IMG]http://img420.imageshack.us/img420/346/dailynewspresleydeadtz5.jpg[/IMG]


Re: Was 9/11 an inside job by the White House ?

Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 4:20 pm
by Flat_Eric
NandoRick wrote:

>>>

Yep. See it now. Missed it first time round amid all the other guff.


>>

Well someone obviously did !!



>>

If I was any more chilled, I'd be deep frozen. Don't worry!



>>

Now I KNOW you've been watching too much X-Files!

Much of what you (or should I say this conspiracy site) presents as "The Truth" amounts to little more than speculation, suspicion, unsubstantiated accusations and pure unadulterated bullshit.

I don't doubt that there are still unanswered questions about 9/11, but I strongly suspect that the full story is far less dramatic than you'd like to believe.


Re: Was 9/11 an inside job by the White House ?

Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 5:17 pm
by nasty
I don't know why this is so hard to believe, the CIA influence governments all over the world every day, using questionable means, so why not their own government and country?

In 1996, the U.S. House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence issued a congressional report estimating that the CIA "easily" breaks "extremely serious laws" in countries around the world, 100,000 times every year. Hundreds of times a day it was estimated.

Too much about that day is questionable, I'm not saying it was the Bush administration, but maybe the Hawks, or some other organistation within the clandestine community.

There must have been some high level assistance given, the knowlege of the war games, reducing the number of military jets. The planning and logistics of this attack.

You have to look at what has been gained by the attack, maybe the Bush administration have just capitalised on the attack for their own gains. But after rigging an election in the world's super power, I would not put anythin past them.

Probably going to get shot down as a conspiracy nut and my reply is short on actual evidence, which is both unconclusive either way in my opinion, but I had to add my two cents anyway.


Re: Was 9/11 an inside job by the White House ?

Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 5:34 pm
by Jock Strap
Yes it was all an inside job.
And Elvis is alive and well and living on the moon.


Re: Was 9/11 an inside job by the White House ?

Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 6:04 pm
by tommy dickfingers
again lack of evidence knocks down conspiracy theories time and again hence the word theorie

Re: Was 9/11 an inside job by the White House ?

Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 8:50 pm
by c.j.jaxxon
Funny!!!!

Re: Was 9/11 an inside job by the White House ?

Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 8:51 pm
by c.j.jaxxon
They did!

28Year Career CIA Official Says 9/11 An Inside Job

Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 10:53 pm
by NandoRick
Highlights missing Pentagon trillions as potential motive

[IMG]http://img175.imageshack.us/img175/6349/070906wtcap9.jpg[/IMG]

A 28-year CIA career man and a former skeptic of alternative 9/11 explanations has gone further than ever before in voicing his convictions that the attacks bore the hallmarks of an inside job and the three buildings in the WTC complex were brought down by controlled demolition.

Bill Christison is a former senior official of the CIA. He was a National Intelligence Officer and the Director of the CIA's Office of Regional and Political Analysis before his retirement in 1979. Since then he has written numerous articles on U.S. foreign policies.

In Christison's recent article, Stop Belittling the Theories About September 11, he afforded credibility to the notion that "significant parts" of the official 9/11 story were false and after careful research he concluded that the twin towers and building 7, "were most probably destroyed by controlled demolition charges placed in the buildings."

"David Griffin believes this all was totally an inside job - I've got to say I think that it was too," said Christison.

Christison initially approached the subject unwilling to even consider that elements of the government could be engaged in such heights of criminality but his research quickly began to change his mind.

"Just about half a year ago it dawned on me that not only was I trying to avoid an issue that might be extraordinarily important - more important than any other issue," said Christison.

"I have since decided that....at least some elements in this US government had contributed in some way or other to causing 9/11 to happen or at least allowing it to happen."

[IMG]http://img301.imageshack.us/img301/5861/070906billsi3.jpg[/IMG]

Christison (pictured) stated that the suspicious collapse of the three buildings, including building 7 which wasn't hit by a plane, were likely the result of controlled demolitions.

"The reason that the two towers in New York actually collapsed and fell all the way to the ground was controlled explosions rather than just being hit by two airplanes."

"All of the characteristics of these demolitions show that they almost had to have been controlled explosions."

Referencing the 2.3 trillion dollars that was discovered to be missing from the Pentagon's coffers, Christison emphasized the fact that with an unlimited budget, the scope of operations that could be undertaken by the military-industrial complex are almost without recourse.

"There is so much money now sloshing around throughout not only the CIA but the intelligence components of the Defense Department - which are actually bigger than the CIA - that these guys can do almost anything they want these days."

Christison said that one of the subsidiary motives behind 9/11 was to take attention away from an impending exposure of the missing trillions and criminal proceedings against high officials - just as LBJ had Kennedy assassinated partly to delay imminent corruption probes that would have sent him to prison.

Christison is just the latest in a deluge of former government and intelligence agency insiders to boldly go public with their doubts about the official story behind 9/11 and he has an urgent message for future whistleblowers who might be considering the same course of action.

"We have got to be willing to be discredited, we have got to stick our necks out - this is just plain too important."