Re: The BGAFD
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 7:57 am
What are you rambling on about, Deuce?
?I think the most important thing is keeping negative/positive comments in perspective.Both are just an individuals view which carries no more weight than that.?
If an individuals view carries no more weight than another individuals view, then why do they call on expert witnesses at trials? People who have a long record of service in a particular field, have studied in that field, and have insights into that field far beyond that of any layman? So, if an individuals view carries no more weight than another individuals view, as you are suggesting, maybe we could dispense with expert witnesses at trials and just call in Joe Bloggs, who might, fortuitously, just be passing the courthouse when the proceedings get to the stage when someone with knowledge of forensics, psychiatry or astro physics is required? If we take your argument to conclusion, the opinion of Joe Bloggs will carry just as much weight as the PhD, the Professor and the Nobel Prize Winner.
?The biggest difference that I can see in Brit Porn is the Girls
Whether you find them attractive is neither here nor there IMHO?
You don?t enlighten us as to what this ?difference? might be, but instead you put forward an argument/opinion, that if it was adopted by all and sundry on the forum would render any further discussion and debate pointless ? ?Wether you find them attractive is neither here nor there IMHO? ? Oh well, that?s settled then. If there?s no further point in discussing it I guess we might as well all chuck in our forum memberships and go and watch Coronation Street of an evening, hey?
You?re an intelligent chap Deuce, but you need to sharpen your arguments up. You need to be more clear and concise. Your train of thought seams to meander here and there, with no real point of view, no conviction and no passion. This is unhelpful, as it tends to muddy the forum waters.
Officer Dibble
?I think the most important thing is keeping negative/positive comments in perspective.Both are just an individuals view which carries no more weight than that.?
If an individuals view carries no more weight than another individuals view, then why do they call on expert witnesses at trials? People who have a long record of service in a particular field, have studied in that field, and have insights into that field far beyond that of any layman? So, if an individuals view carries no more weight than another individuals view, as you are suggesting, maybe we could dispense with expert witnesses at trials and just call in Joe Bloggs, who might, fortuitously, just be passing the courthouse when the proceedings get to the stage when someone with knowledge of forensics, psychiatry or astro physics is required? If we take your argument to conclusion, the opinion of Joe Bloggs will carry just as much weight as the PhD, the Professor and the Nobel Prize Winner.
?The biggest difference that I can see in Brit Porn is the Girls
Whether you find them attractive is neither here nor there IMHO?
You don?t enlighten us as to what this ?difference? might be, but instead you put forward an argument/opinion, that if it was adopted by all and sundry on the forum would render any further discussion and debate pointless ? ?Wether you find them attractive is neither here nor there IMHO? ? Oh well, that?s settled then. If there?s no further point in discussing it I guess we might as well all chuck in our forum memberships and go and watch Coronation Street of an evening, hey?
You?re an intelligent chap Deuce, but you need to sharpen your arguments up. You need to be more clear and concise. Your train of thought seams to meander here and there, with no real point of view, no conviction and no passion. This is unhelpful, as it tends to muddy the forum waters.
Officer Dibble