Page 6 of 7
Re: Racial P.C.
Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2005 10:24 am
by Spook
And in the UK - where we had far less war damage - the post war reconstruction and redevelopment was going on well into the 1960s and 1970s.
Much of that reconstruction, Paternoster Square, Tricorn Centre et al, is now seen as a blight and was done without the help of any commies.
It takes a very long time to reconstruct a city after a time when 75% of the buildings are uninhabitable.
Seeing as Erno Goldfinger - one of the main architects of the post war modernist movement whose buildings continue to "blight" the UK - was born in Budapest, it seems unlikely that redevelopment of a "western" Hungary would have escaped a mass of brutalist concrete blocks.
Re: Racial P.C.
Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2005 11:32 am
by Richas
I never said you had no rights to express your opinions. Please wuote to me where I said that and when you realise I didn't remove your head from you never regions and apologise for slandering me, by putting falsw words in my mouth.
What I DID say was you clearly have no understanding of communism and certainly havn't read Marx. Communes are a feature of communism, not a defining factor, or even a neccesary one, and feel free to email me these 'fictional' proffessors names. If they do exist, and they don't know that, they clearly shouldn't be teaching.
Re: Racial P.C.
Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2005 2:29 pm
by nachovx
I think you may mean he libeled you ... slander is oral communication of false statements injurious to a person's reputation.
Re: Racial P.C.
Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2005 2:40 pm
by nachovx
And I'll just add that he didn't libel you either ... because libel is a false publication, as in writing, print, signs, or pictures, that damages a person's reputation .... and merely thinking you didn't want him to post doesn't damage your reputation. A difference of opinion or a misunderstanding doesn't constitute either libel or slander.
PS i''m not joining the argument.
Re: Racial P.C.
Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2005 1:07 pm
by Rude Boy
Yawn...this conversation is as dull and boring as communism itself...can't be arsed anymore.
Re: Racial P.C.
Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2005 6:46 pm
by Richas
"you sir don;t (sic) have the first clue what your (sic) talking about. Come back when you do, and I'll hear you out."
Oddly enough I took that to mean you felt my opinions were worthless compared to yours and not worth airing on this message board. Forgive me for so carelessly misinterpreting you.
Apology accepted. I think the way you totally misinterpret what people say and push your own sub text into it is very odd yes, but very telling, and explains why your grasp of history is a bit suspect to say the least. Now you've reread my words you may have got the meaning, or shall I make it a bit clearer... you have as much right to express your opinions as any one, go for it, I just don't have to listen to them when they are a load of old tosh...sorry but that's my right to!
Re: Racial P.C.
Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2005 6:47 pm
by Richas
I was actually intending on suing him nachovx..just didn't like him putting words in my mouth. Thanks for being anal enough to go through all that though ..lawyer?
Re: Racial P.C.
Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2005 6:57 pm
by Richas
butt just to humour you:
Communism is an economic and political system based on the principle "From each according to their ability, to each according to their need." It stresses that the control of the means of producing economic goods in a society should reside in the hands of those who invest their labor for production. In its ideal form, social classes cease to exist, there is no coercive governmental structures, and everyone lives in abundance without supervision from a ruling class. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels popularized this theory in their 1848 Communist Manifesto.
What is Communism?
Communism is the doctrine of the conditions of the liberation of the proletariat.
And every other website will confirm that. Sorry if you think I'm unjustified in treating you as an utter joke...but cmon you claim to have studied under these top proffeser, yet you dont know what communism is, rididiculously suggest it's nothing to do with marx it's creator, and make the laughably stupid connection COMMUNism therefore = communes....did you get an A for that....lol...sorry son, don't mean to take the piss honestly and apologies if your genuinely offended but I HAVE genuinly studied this in high places with learned and have read Marx...so come of it your not fooling anyone. Your brand of 'communism' been garnered from half hour down the local anarchists club by the sound of it...loony.