Casting Call

[videokim]

It was not the stance people objected to it was the referral that escorts were somehow unclean, we do understand newcommers might think this but not a Pro company surely not.
Its was these strange remarks that made people wary about them.

Kim x

[videokim]

You will find models doing bare back have more std's than UK escorts (that use condoms for intercourse & have monthly certs) over a given period so in sense they are the safe bet, it may be different in the States but here some certs are not worth the paper they are written on & this is why as a Pro porn actress i only do condom protected sex scenes with both Am & Pro models.
Different countries have different taboo's so people will forgive you on your views & at the end of the day everyone as the right to have their say...good luck on your new venture.

[Matt P]

I'm sorry but you have no such noble motives.
You were the author of the orginal post, something that seems to have been neglected to mention in tale telling, in which you intentionally tried to harm the career of a performer after a disagreement or "ugly exchange" as you put it. It's for that reason I brought it up here as it's prudent to those that may be intrested in working for you.

Even now you have resorted to emotional blackmail with "at least I won't be telling anyone they have HIV" that is a real concern of us all & it's disguisting that you would even consider using it as a justification to your spiteful attack after it's backfired & exposed you for what you were, hence I suspect the real reason you requested it removed. It's not off topic to mention how you made such an attack when you're looking for models.

Don't position yourself as the safe alternative when your only motivation is to get models/performers to do what you want.

I get myself in trouble for what I say on here, I've lost more jobs than I can recall, so I keep quite on a lot of things but in you I recognise a malnipulative streak that I just have real concerns about & it doesn't sit well with the previous post attacking a model which you named.

The opinions & views expressed in my post are my own personal views & are neither endorsed or condoned by the forum on which I post. They are not to promote or liable a individual or organisation but reflect my views in response to a specific post & or post.
That's just in case anyone is tempted again to threaten another for my sake.

[tj the cameraman]

i'm going to add to this, my partner got a email from this guy, shes pretty good on the PC and did a little but of research into him and the company name, nothing added up, she did a company house check on the company and its changed its name three times, went bust in 2003, all the information she was givin just did not look right at all, the companys he quoted she looked up and there was no sign of connection with this guy, the more we looked at it the more it was iffey. well we not take it any further just left it !

[Matt P]

The post I'm refering to was one authored by yourself called "warning this model is a prostitute" which you created in response to a disagreement with the model.

I will never give it a rest when it comes to looking out for my fellow performers be they male or female. You employ tatics of malnipulation, threats, insults & coercion thus regardless of taking a well known name you are no less a danger to performers.

My soap box is my conscience. Up until now I've been good mannered.

I've no respect for you but given that other more deserving producers & performers use this forum I'll post no further on this.

I sincerely hope any performer that does work for you has the common sense to be wary lest they come to harm, as it's not my position to say who one should or shouldn't work for but I've real concerns about you.