Page 5 of 5
Re: Lance Armstrong
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 3:23 pm
by dog
Robches = Troll
Re: Lance Armstrong
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:23 am
by Robches
Dog = very gullible person.
Re: teamates testifying about the team
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 6:53 am
by Deuce Bigolo
= guilty as sin
I've watched this circus unfold for years and never believed the french media had any real proof
When big name former team mates start coming out saying this is what was the norm in the team lingering doubts soon evaporate.
They all cant be liars
The main guy in a team cant be the best if everyone else is doping
and hes clean
When Barco got themselves found out awhile back we knew the drug cheats were so far ahead of the testers that insiders claiming doping werent just out to save their own skins but they knew the game was up.
As much as I admire Lance Armstrong for over coming cancer and doing work for that same cause I just wish people would end this era by saying all who participated and finished near the top were most likely tainted.
All drugs do is enhance the talent and the amount of pain you can endure during training & racing.
You take someone who has no underlying talent and dope them they wont win the tour de france.
Re: Lance Armstrong
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 6:36 am
by Bill Malone
He got to repeatedly fuck Sheryl Crow for years. This is karma. Swings and roundabouts.
Re: Lance Armstrong
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:18 pm
by stevieq
Since I last put up this thread, it seems that the sponsors are now going to sue him for the 'winning bonus's' he got from the Tour De France.
Which was my main thought about this whole seedy business.
Should he profit from this?...The answer it seems is a big NO, and quite rightly so.