egafd.com

Colonel. I,m only going to say this once, I could not give a flying fuck who does what and on what forum, my regret is that Maggs cannot post on here anymore, my gratitude is that the ned has gone, they are welcome to him. So, dont be shocked I have no problem with Jacques, never have as far as I know, If he has a problem with me thats his problem.
Now, onward and upward, new people come and go all the time on here, some great and some complete cunts, and I cannot always be here myself due to commitments in my working life. It's only a fucking forum mate, nobody died.
Now, for a spot of Jamesons and a cheese sandwich.

Lizard wrote:

> Colonel. I,m only going to say this once, I could not give a
> flying fuck who does what and on what forum, my regret is that
> Maggs cannot post on here anymore, my gratitude is that the ned
> has gone, they are welcome to him.

Total agreement. I am trying to be kind to the tartan one, but his last two posts elsewhere are about [a] Jeff Beck and me not reading his Forum. Of course I read it, Liz! It is entertainment of the highest order!


>So, dont be shocked I have
> no problem with Jacques, never have as far as I know, If he has
> a problem with me thats his problem.

I have no problems with Jacques, or Sammikins or Caradog. Do I have to repeat it ad infinitum?? But my reasoning is this- why have they felt the need to go and post over there? There should be one forum and this should be it. Any problems with that?


> Now, onward and upward, new people come and go all the time on
> here, some great and some complete cunts, and I cannot always
> be here myself due to commitments in my working life. It's only
> a fucking forum mate, nobody died.

True. I shall remind people that magoo is missed too. Can he be swapped for Olay? And where is Rasputin?


> Now, for a spot of Jamesons and a cheese sandwich.

I prefer real ale and a beef sandwich or a steak and kidney pie or a Cornish pasty, followed by some anecdotes and mighty hwyl- and then preferably a bed above the pub. Some pubs still do. Pure bliss.

But I know where you are coming from and what you mean.

[quote]my reasoning is this- why have they felt the need to go and post over there? There should be one forum and this should be it. Any problems with that?[/quote]

Are you saying bgafd members shouldn't be allowed to join other forums? Come, come, colonel.....I know you don't mean that, surely.....?

But why the need for another O/T Forum for our band of porn loving heroes, Sam? What if someone joins the rival/competitor and not here- will they be asked to join here as well?

Why the undermining of here, Sam? Why does the other place feel the need to misspell 'BGAFD' in a way which I feel means something very offensive to the regular posters on here?

Why are the other place abusing the goodwill of here, the posters and the Admins?

Given this abuse, is it not fair that you and others need to post on one of these forums but not both? What is wrong with BGAFD?- you have still not told me.

[quote]But why the need for another O/T Forum for our band of porn loving heroes, Sam? What if someone joins the rival/competitor and not here- will they be asked to join here as well?[/quote]

How is huffers a rival or competitor to here? I don't know Jacques plans but I don't think he has the time to set up another British Pornstar database. It's merely an alternative; and below, I'll quote my previous explanation of what huffers is (at least to me):


I wrote a few days ago:[quote]It was first formed by Jacques to replace the fantasy footy forum which gets closed in the off-season. Jacques' made a real good job of it and so it's grown into a place where we can let off steam, or talk about stuff that will give the mods on here a headache deleting! They don't want that hassle of constantly clearing up after us, and no one likes their posts being constantly deleted, so an alternative forum is good for us both.[/quote]

[quote]Why the undermining of here, Sam? Why does the other place feel the need to misspell 'BGAFD' in a way which I feel means something very offensive to the regular posters on here?[/quote]

Why not? Are you saying regular posters on here don't undermine anybody? Again: it's a place to let off steam where forumites can express themselves in a different environment; a place where certain thoughts, or complaints are likely to cause flame wars, mass deletions and the odd banning on this forum. It's a place for Wazza & magoo to keep in touch with some old chums off this board as well??and it's easier for the bgafd admin if flame wars on here aren't having to be perpetually cleaned up and moderated. This is surely a good thing, no?

[quote]Given this abuse, is it not fair that you and others need to post on one of these forums but not both?[/quote]

Fairness? It's just another forum, mate; there are millions of forums! I don't see you taking issue with.....for instance, OEJ??seeing as he can post on here as well as the UKAP forums??in private.

I think the people that are objecting to huffers is mainly due to the fact a certain ex-forumite of here is given a voice. It's not really about complaints of elitism, competition to bgafd O/T, abuse or undermining..... It's about a childish, unremitting, dogmatic detestation of everything WZR??pure and simple.

For what it's worth, Colonel, I only post on two forums (or three during the football season). In spite of your feelings on the subject, I missed discussing stuff with certain people who were shown the door from this place: Magoo and WZR. If our corporal-punishment loving simian friend would join the huffers, it would be wonderful.

Be honest. Look around. Some of the stuff posted here is excellent, some is not. As it always was and always will be. The main forum is the hub of this place. The whole site's raison d'etre was and is the girls who work in the adult film business. The O/T was created (before your time, my military chum) because too many of us were wandering off on tangents within threads. Steve can be considered the daddy of this forum, though Magoo and jj and Liz and various others (myself included) were also guilty of wandering so far off the map we were on different atlases.

The mods here have been very accommodating over the years, but are not inclined to allow some discussions that others feel need airing. Therefore, the wonderful Jacques set up a site where people could discuss such things. It is his site, his rules, and the rest of us---including your bete noir--- are grateful to be given the opportunity to have our say there.

I've fallen out with several folk over the years, but I don't think I'd treat any the way you do your mortal enemy. If you loathe someone, fine, ignore them. It removes any power they have over you. Each time you mention their name, it empowers them and gives them a stronger hold on your psyche. I know I've said some nasty and vicious things over the years, but the very worst I'd wish for any of those I'd consider enemies is never to see them again. Not disease, disaster or death---just to vanish from my life.

WZR is out of your life, yet still you clutch to him and his memory. What exactly does that say about you? You're a mostly smart, decent guy, Colonel (save for a deep-rooted homophobia that is rather worrying), but why do you continue this enmity when your enemy has left?

(Apologies if any of this reads as rubbish; I've been at the wine)

Caractacus wrote:

> The mods here have been very accommodating over the years, but
> are not inclined to allow some discussions that others feel
> need airing.

You mean the discussions on the so-called threads that just target individuals if they have the cheek to disagree with the nameless one?

The same nameless one who persists in emailing the individual concerned even after being asked not to and also posts said emails on the site in some pathetic attempt to brag about their childish witterings.

Be honest the site is member only for those who back slap the all mighty (in their opinion).

Those who say hold on thats bollocks get a thread and the bum-chums a chance to have a natter !laugh!

I'm replying to randyandy buty including in it some replies to Sam and Caradog- simply because three replies is egomanical and andy is talking the most sense on the topic.

Firstly, I have no enmity towards our tartan chummie. This must be the tenth time I have repeated this on here. I can see the twentieth time on the horizon given people's perceptions of me- themselves stereotypical.

Secondly, my old mate Caradog must have overdone the Shiraz to say that I have homophobic in any way. Er- no, I am not. I may make a few jokes about it from time to time. Are we not allowed to joke now? And, although I resent having to post a little about me, some friends of mine are regulars at the Brighton Gay Pride. I am not gay, btw, and I don't know about them. Perhaps they are, perhaps Caradog is, perhaps not. Risible nonsense but forgiven- after all, Caractacus did fight off the Romans for 10 years.

Andy hits nails on heads. No-one has yet stated why the other place- ok, the Huffers- calls BGAFD by a acronym that must refer to something deeply offensive to many posters on here. No-one has stated why the tartan one has boasted on there of emailing people on here with abusive emails- andy, Dave Wells, etc. Sam/Caradog- why has he done this? Can you show me where you have criticised him for doing this? Feel free to post this information below.

The real fact is this. For all the social good of linking magoo with the folk on here- and I shall repeat that I think that maggs should be re-admitted on here- the Huffers appears to allow abuse and harassment from one of its Moderators! Yes, this place has also had dodgy posters from time to time- but the Mods deal with them- they do not make them Mods.

So- the ball is in your court.

[quote]Firstly, I have no enmity towards our tartan chummie.[/quote]

I could quote plenty of posts, from you, that would contradict the above, colonel.

[quote]No-one has yet stated why the other place- ok, the Huffers- calls BGAFD by a acronym that must refer to something deeply offensive to many posters on here.[/quote]

Yes they have. I'm sure Wazza posted his explanation of said acronym on huffers, last night; it's a dig at certain right-wingers on here, who are never moderated or reproached, despite the FAQs. Just like you calling Wazza "the fucking ned," or numerous other acronyms that people use on here. You may have a point in that the acronym kinda tars all forumites with the same brush, which I do find unfortunate, but on the other hand, the non-racists and bigots don't exactly come out in force and -to use a Dibbleism- 'slap them down' do they?

Since I'm answering for other huffers' attitudes on here, maybe you can answer for other OTers? Why was my pedantry an issue on a tediously long thread, but the complete, in your face racism, was left unreproved? Is/was Wazza's attitude, on here, really worse than blatant racism? From other posters reactions to Wazza and racism, I'd say racism is definitely tolerated more around here??which means that this acronym you complain about may have some merit. Alas, no one seems to take this onboard.

As for the e-mails: I think randyandy will have to send his thanks to Jacques and huffers. When Wazza read the defamatory posts on here, the only way he could retort was via e-mail. Since the huffers now have a public forum for anyone to peruse, Wazza -I'm guessing- has stopped e-mailing his rivals and uses the forum as his soap box: problemo solved.

Just a couple of points:

Your "few jokes... from time to time" is more common than perhaps you realise. But fine, I'll take your word for it that you are a friend of the friends of Dorothy.

The acronym business has been covered by Sam, but I'd like to add my tuppence-worth. On at least three occasions in the last few years, I've almost walked out of this forum. The constant, vicious, mindless crap of those advocating the rounding up of Britons, born and brought up here, in cattle trucks and sending them overseas because they don't fit in with their own genetic holy grail gets tedious and depressing, particularly when no one bothers to argue with the white supremecists. Dare to bring someone up on a point of logic within a post, though, and all hell breaks loose.

Oh, and a final thing. If I were banned from a public forum, yet was constantly being bad-mouthed on it, having my beliefs and positions wildly distorted by those who obviously hated me, I'd be inclined to write to those responsible again and again and again. The FAQs contain posting guidelines, but they are not always strictly followed.

Yet again, if you were to spend at least 2% of the bile you reserve for WZR fighting the white-is-right hatemongers here, the acronym you complain about would indeed be redundant and wildly inaccurate. But keep your anger for the important things in life----tartan Neds and the like.