egafd.com

As already mentioned, if you have nothing to hide,then there should be no problem with accepting being stopped and searched.The problem for Police is the amount of paperwork involved in nearly all aspects of Policing( i have a niece who is a WPC in Newcastle and the biggest gripe is spending most of the shift in an office filling out the forms resulting from any Police action!).
There needs to be a cull on paperwork whilst still retaining a measure of accountability,not an easy task but surely possible.I suggest the Police look to the supervising officers to actually supervise their officers instead of relying on a trail of paperwork in case anything goes wrong. As in many facets of society it is a lack of supervision that is the problem,be it parents,teachers,or superiors at work.

Actually, I read the Independent.....good that you aren't tempted into Nazism though...



Mike_CFC wrote:

> I can see you're a Guardian reader colonel !laugh!
>
> As much chance of me voting BNP as Richard Littlejohn has on
> writing for that paper you read !wink!

I do laugh when I read things like this!

The Chiefs of the Armed Forces do not want conscription at all.

planeterotica wrote:

> The Old Bill allready have the right to do what they like as we
> now live in a police state, what about the Brazillian shot at
> Stockwell underground they didnt even bother to search him they
> just shot him, the police can stop and search anyone under the
> Prevention Of Terrorism Act if they want to so why do they need
> more rights.
>
>

You still think it was the cops that did that?
It's got security services written all over it mate.