Re: "Poverty".
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 4:45 pm
warren zevon rip wrote:
> Trumpton wrote:
>
> > Where does all the state money, such as child benefit, go?
> > This benefit is supposed to be used to prevent pecuniary
> > deficiencies.
>
> Presumably the parent spend it.
Shouldn't child benefit be spent on the child?
> Doesn't make the child unpoor
> though.
Ah, we have agreement!
>
> > Eh? What about the continuing rise in childhood obsesity?
>
> Just because the average weight of UK children rises, it
> doesn't mean that the weights of ALL UK children rise.
Are you suggesting that the weight of a significant proportion of children actually is on the decrease?
> > There is a difference between poverty and poor!
>
> Poverty is actually the "state of being poor", so no, there is
> no difference.
Poverty is the state of being financially poor, whereas poor is being in abject need or a state of destitution.
> Trumpton wrote:
>
> > Where does all the state money, such as child benefit, go?
> > This benefit is supposed to be used to prevent pecuniary
> > deficiencies.
>
> Presumably the parent spend it.
Shouldn't child benefit be spent on the child?
> Doesn't make the child unpoor
> though.
Ah, we have agreement!
>
> > Eh? What about the continuing rise in childhood obsesity?
>
> Just because the average weight of UK children rises, it
> doesn't mean that the weights of ALL UK children rise.
Are you suggesting that the weight of a significant proportion of children actually is on the decrease?
> > There is a difference between poverty and poor!
>
> Poverty is actually the "state of being poor", so no, there is
> no difference.
Poverty is the state of being financially poor, whereas poor is being in abject need or a state of destitution.