Page 5 of 6
Re: Radio One.....un-listenable
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 2:30 pm
by Trumpton
PondLife wrote:
> Terry Wogan has about 8 million listeners per day.
Allegedly!
He's probably paid each one a percentage of his vast over-blown publicly paid for salary to listen to the vomit that freely flows from 'it's' shit-ridden gob-hole.
I DO hate Wogan !furious!
Re: Radio One.....un-listenable
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 2:47 pm
by Trumpton
warren zevon rip wrote:
>
> Deffo. I know many folk my age who "wake up with Wogan", and I
> am sure you are actually a "TOG" (Trumpton:old git"?)
I'd rather have my bollocks cut off with rusty germ infected knife than listen to Wo-always-has-been-shit-and-will-always-be-shit-gan!!!
Re: Radio One.....un-listenable
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 2:54 pm
by Trumpton
warren zevon rip wrote:
>
> There'll be a website devoted to this, I'm sure.
Yeah it's called; www.whatwoganhatersdotoavoidlisteningtoshitfromthatcuntingmotherfuckerwogan.com
Re: Radio One.....un-listenable
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 2:56 pm
by PondLife
Respect, WZR.
Actually, I would really appreciate you opinion about some good places to visit. If you would care to email me at the address in my profile I would be very happy to receive your advice.
Hell, I hope that some of this is spelt correctly. Eight pints of lager usually does not help one little bit.
David James
Re: Radio One.....un-listenable
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 2:59 pm
by Snake Diamond
Direct from Google:
terry wogan
If you are one of the dedicated 9 million listeners to the weekday breakfast-show ramblings of
Terry Wogan and his BBC Radio 2 underlings, you should feel ...
Re: Radio One.....un-listenable
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 3:20 pm
by Trumpton
ME?
It's a case of 'I'll fight him on the beaches, on the landing grounds, in the fields' etc. Never, never, never!!!
Re: Radio One.....un-listenable
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 5:18 am
by ATS
PondLife wrote:
> Well, I sort of agree with WZR and ATS, but only because I'm a
> nice person.
>
> The bottom line is that I know that this country isn't run
> particularly well, so I certainly don't need to be reminded of
> it day after day after day, on Radio 4, by John Humphries.
>
> So I would rather spend the rest of my life travelling the
> world, looking for a better place to live rather than be
> involved in the minutia of analysis that pretends to be
> intelligent discussion from 6am to 9am on Radio 4.
>
> Look, WZR, I've always respected your views and have never
> criticised them, I don't think. However, this is the life I
> live. At a 'certain age' people cease wanting to have intense
> analysis of the world around them. Perhaps, at 61 I have
> reached that age. I would rather have a laugh, have fun, get
> pissed overlooking wonderful views than analyse anything too
> much.
>
> I've been fairly highly educated, with four sets of
> professional qualifications that I can put on letterheads,
> after my name, if I was vain enough to do that. That is not
> boasting in any way. I am not proud of it but I simply include
> the information to show that people with a reasonable intellect
> can still prefer fun rather than rather than boring analysis.
>
> I read the FT every day. At least it is not full of doom and
> gloom that all the mainstream daily newspapers in the UK,
> (Telegraph, Guardian, Times et al) are, each day.
>
> Yes, ATS, Chris Moyles has an arrogant personality. I agree.
> But, if the BBC radio listening audience figures can be
> believed, Terry Wogan has about 8 million listeners per day.
> Chris Moyles has somewhat less, but both have far more than
> Radio 4 has. Perhaps that is a reflection of the low intellect
> that radio audiences in the UK have. Well, in that case, I am
> happy to be included amongst the people who prefer fun to
> analysis.
>
> I hope you will take this message in the spirit in which it is
> intended. You are perfectly correct in having your views and I
> totally respect them.
>
> All I ask is that you consider my viewpoint and take account of
> the fact that people's view on life and the Universe do change
> over time.
>
> E&OE, due to drunkenness
>
> David James
>
>
No problem at all David we are all entitled to our own thoughts
and opinions on anything. So long has it doesn't end up as offensive
or personal. I believe that's the whole point of boards like this