egafd.com

so if producers want to keep producing they have no choice but to reluctantly accept the less appealling girls.

I can see what you mean but this aint the case at all.

If (and when) I shoot a girl who some might consider "less appealing" it would be in the spirit of keeping it real Thats where Ive always been at and staging sex requires a different skill that I wouldnt have time for and nor would it glean the results for me knowing it was fake

Being in the game as long as I have I've come to realise that beautiful girls dont always outsell the average girl next door types The strongest seller is their looks, attitude and personality

Jenna Jameson vs Belladonna

Who is prettier? Who really gets you going in the trouser department?

Now this turns my stomach!






Bleuurgh!

wouldn't open the door to jenna jameson.

Well I must be in the minority, here. I love to see lesbians swapping spit, pissing on each other and using strap ons. The rough, nasty stuff I think is great. And I like to see a good gape getting rimmed/pissed in and what not. As long as it's girl on girl.

it'd be interesting to see what she looked like without all the tatoos, if anyone is any good with photohop? She seems to be one of Brazzers go to options particularly for the hot and mean girl/girl series.

One man's....etc...what I want to see is the woman and man as equal partners and not the woman being slapped, spat on etc. Sex is supposed to be mutually enjoyable. Add no homoerotic focusing on the roided out studs six pack.

one eyed jack wrote:

> so if producers want to keep producing they have no choice but
> to reluctantly accept the less appealling girls.
>
> I can see what you mean but this aint the case at all.
>
> If (and when) I shoot a girl who some might consider "less
> appealing" it would be in the spirit of keeping it real Thats
> where Ive always been at and staging sex requires a different
> skill that I wouldnt have time for and nor would it glean the
> results for me knowing it was fake
>
> Being in the game as long as I have I've come to realise that
> beautiful girls dont always outsell the average girl next door
> types The strongest seller is their looks, attitude and
> personality
>
> Jenna Jameson vs Belladonna
>
> Who is prettier? Who really gets you going in the trouser
> department?
>
>

I absolutely get what you're saying but by less appealling I was simply thinking about tattoos and/or boob jobs. If you had the option of identical twins but one was all natural whereas the other happened to have had a boob job and/or tattoos, there's no way you're going to give the job to the latter.

So what I was saying was that I assume the reason that there are so many less appealling women (women with tattoos and/or boob jobs) in porn is because the higher standard of girl isn't enticed into the industry because the money and work opportunities aren't what they once were, so producers have little option but to accept tattoos and boob jobs.

Agree with most of the above.

I don't mind tattoo's but when a model covers her body in them it can get too much.

No matter how much guys beg girls not to have a boob job they still do.

Very few girls with boob jobs look better than before. Never better than a
natural girl.

Also the these camera angles were you see too much hairy man ass.

The best directors and editors know how to eliminate this.

"Anal is wrong because it isn't what our creator intended, and it's a forbidden act."

Interesting how you didn't put lesbian porn on the list since "your" creator takes a dim view of that sort of thing. Also doubt he would be endeared to you posting on a porn forum. Could be argued you covet thy neighbours wife when you watch porn.

"Anal is wrong because it isn't what our creator intended, and it's a forbidden act."

Thats also maybe the reason why its so popular