Page 5 of 8

Re: BLUEBIRD 28TH?

Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 4:16 pm
by Porn Baron
What revolutionary about a pile of horse shit? !deadhorse!


Re: BLUEBIRD 28TH?

Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 4:41 pm
by Porn Baron
What it could be? What it should be?
After two years they still have a second rate site. Why don't they just go to brazzers or reality kings and see how it should be done? Top quality and affordable. Why don't they spend more than ?2.99 and get someone other than bob in his hut at the bottom of the garden to design a site?
They have nothing new or exceptional. The only original thing they have are the British babes we have never seen before. And we are not allowed to see them!


Re: BLUEBIRD 28TH?

Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 6:18 am
by Dace
exactly - there doesn't need to be anything "revolutionary" for something that works so well as it is i.e sites like reality bros or brassers are simple, you pay your money, you get a high quality scenes with a hot girls in it - theres no need to change this format !

Re: BLUEBIRD 28TH?

Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 9:50 pm
by hiwatt
Information for you Porn Baron.
Having seen the new BB site in development, Brazzers have asked us to consult on making their site as customer friendly and hot as ours.

Bad choice of example to make your point, I guess.

Re: BLUEBIRD 28TH?

Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 9:53 pm
by hiwatt
It's an 'absolute mess' how exactly ?

You can navigate to any film or girl from a simple drop down menu: exactly the same system that Killergram uses.

So if our system is a mess - then so is theirs.

Or are you just flaming for the sake of it ? !tumbleweed!

Re: BLUEBIRD 28TH?

Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 10:02 pm
by hiwatt
"Right now it looks like a site from the 90's, almost everything is wrong. The layout, the colours, the navigation.. :(
Even the blog has images that have been sized wrong so the dimensions are messed up (squashed) but right clicking and 'viewing image' shows the proper proportioned image. Schoolboy error stuff."

1. OK: what sites from the 90's did you have in mind ? Colour Climax ? You're right that the Site does have a retro/pop art aesthetic. That's deliberate. It's our style.

2. You don't say what's 'wrong' with the layout. On the film pages, you have the big graphic, the movie description, the cast list in the centre. The vids to the right, the pix to the left. How would You suggest laying it out ?

3. Navigation: you can go to any movie or girl with 1 click of the mouse from dropdown menus. You can't do that e.g. on Brazzers, or Reality Kings. It's how Killergram does and it's how we've always done it: we both think its the best way. So what's a better way of navigating than 1-click dropdown menus in your opinion ?

4. The Blog images are posted by different people because its an open access Blog to the whole company across 2 continents & 3 different countries. Sure sometimes Bloggers don't presize their pixs correctly. But it's totally free content: how complaining do you wanna be ?

So, if you can please provide some more information on 1- 4, that'd be a better help than just saying "I don' like it". Thanks


Re: BLUEBIRD 28TH?

Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 5:24 am
by Dace
Brazzers have seen your ridiculous website and want you to consult on theirs ?
Are you sure? What I suggest they do is hire a team of 10 year olds to do their html programming for a start.

Do they also want you to consult on their customer service skills?

do me a favour

Re: BLUEBIRD 28TH?

Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 5:29 am
by Dace
I take that back, the new site isn't as bad as the old one, still have trouble believing brazzers want to copy it though, their site is ace