egafd.com

oh and by the way, i have a law degree and am well aware of the law of defamation.

its not a defamatory statement. there was enough evidence for the director of public prosecutions in the states to bring a case against him, although a conviction was not secured - on the grounds of constitutional rights to freedom of expression.

its not a defamatory statement if it is reasonable based on the facts. if the facts are that a grown man takes young looking girls, some of whom even appear to be below legal age (even though of course they are) then proceeds to dress that actress in a "childish" outfit AND THEN has on occassion had them verbalise, as part of the act, the fact that they are, for instance, twelve years old, i think there is a pretty strong case for the statement i made.

note also that i said "i think he is...". this clearly demarcates what i said as opinon and not a statement of fact, which would be taken into account in any legal proceedings that arose.


and i stand by it, i think he is a paedo/has paedo tendencies. same goes for max hardcore devotees.

warren zevon rip wrote:

Given that 11 million odd people
> read the Sun,

With you on that one.

Thank you... I always like someone who thinks they may love me... thats lovely and plattering....
yay

If I was in Germany, doing a ggg, I'm sure I could be coxed into a 666 and otherwise....

Isabel in a 666 production: that I would like to see.

warren, your argument is completely disingenuous and i'm sure you know it.

when do you ever see page 3 girls of the "barely legal pre-pubescent" appearance that max hardcore specialises in?

you don't.

roleplay is fine. schoolgirls uniforms etc is fine. getting young-looking girls to pretend they are 12 is frankly appalling. you know this and i think it touches a nerve, hence your defensiveness.

as for use of the word 'paedo', this is because i cannot be arsed typing the full word 'paedophile' every time i post up. The fact that you are pulling me up on this to me smacks of a diversionary tactic and an attempt to instigate and win a side-argument when you are losing the main one.

your comment:
"I know Max Hardocre stuff is pretty weird, but to suggest that his fans are paedophiles is exactly the attitude that keeps porn a shameful thing in Bristain"

yes, thats right. the reason the british porn industry isnt making millions is because people think max hardcore and fans are paedos. thanks for clearing that up.


you are losing at the internet.