Re: BGAFD FORUM posting decline
Posted: Sat Mar 30, 2013 8:39 am
thealtruist wrote:
> Are you talking about just this forum or the whole thing?
>
> I post a lot in the O/T forum but find it's being ruined by
> people who think they're interllectually superior and won't
> shut up. Yes, I'm talking about David Johnson. A man who argues
> just for the sake of arguing. I find his posts monotonous,
> longwinded and boring. It wouldn't be so bad if he wasn't so
> arrogant.
Just stop reading his posts, I did ages ago. Once you've read half a dozen, you've read them all. They're all the same format;
"Labour is great, everyone else is crap." "I'm right about everything, everyone else is wrong" All presented in a condescending manner in an attempt to belittle the person he's talking at.
I haven't read any of his stuff in ages, but I bet it's still the same format.
It's why an ignore function would be useful. You wouldn't have to avoid it, you'd never see it. I could put all the TV listings posters on there too and thin down the feed.
Probably not cost effective to get new software though.
> Are you talking about just this forum or the whole thing?
>
> I post a lot in the O/T forum but find it's being ruined by
> people who think they're interllectually superior and won't
> shut up. Yes, I'm talking about David Johnson. A man who argues
> just for the sake of arguing. I find his posts monotonous,
> longwinded and boring. It wouldn't be so bad if he wasn't so
> arrogant.
Just stop reading his posts, I did ages ago. Once you've read half a dozen, you've read them all. They're all the same format;
"Labour is great, everyone else is crap." "I'm right about everything, everyone else is wrong" All presented in a condescending manner in an attempt to belittle the person he's talking at.
I haven't read any of his stuff in ages, but I bet it's still the same format.
It's why an ignore function would be useful. You wouldn't have to avoid it, you'd never see it. I could put all the TV listings posters on there too and thin down the feed.
Probably not cost effective to get new software though.