Page 4 of 5

Re: O/T? Rocco's perversion in Paris

Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2003 8:00 pm
by clive
Never really liked roccos stuff
pretty mysoginist...not my style...too rogh and hes getting bored i reckon

Re: O/T? Rocco's perversion in Paris

Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2003 8:50 pm
by magoo
Just take the tube bit from a squid and cut the required length of tube from it. Then use a staple gun to attach it to yer old chap. Saw it on Blue Peter.

Thats what I did when I converted from Judaism last week. I was a buddist before that but the bald head is too cold and all that chanting upset my neighbours. I was thinking of becoming a muslim next week but changed my mind incase I got carted off to Cuba by Dubyas gang.

Re: O/T? Rocco's perversion in Paris

Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2003 9:03 pm
by magoo
When its not designed to arouse I suppose.

Any material designed to sexually arouse is porn according to the dictionary. But footage of say a man caught on CCTV attacking a woman is not porn even if some sickos find it arousing. Its not porn because its not created to sexually arouse. So therefor even a snuff movie would be porn because it was created with the intention to sexually exite even if it was only made for one very sick person.

Magoo......Philosopher (I wank therefor I am)

Re: O/T? Rocco's perversion in Paris

Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2003 10:08 pm
by chubbs
i heard rocco and kelly were going to do a remake of crash but with less sickening sex scenes

Re: O/T? Rocco's perversion in Paris

Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2003 11:09 pm
by buttsie
Is that why you're more trying than the rest?

cheers
B...OZ

Re: O/T? Rocco's perversion in Paris

Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2003 11:12 pm
by buttsie
Being an Agnostic is the go?

All the spirituality you can handle without a safety blanket..very adult

cheers
B.....OZ

Re: O/T? Rocco's perversion in Paris

Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2003 4:39 pm
by jj
Trouble with that definition is that it presupposes the intention of the film-maker.
A snuff movie made for non-sexual motives (assuming such a thing is possible), viewed by someone who finds it sexually arousing, becomes porn, then........

Re: O/T? Rocco's perversion in Paris

Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2003 4:55 pm
by jos3ph1n3 ??33?
does that mean erotic art is porn?

Re: O/T? Rocco's perversion in Paris

Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2003 8:14 pm
by magoo
No it doesnt become porn just because someone finds it arousing. I mean there might be some freaks out there who get a hard on watching war films or documentaries about hideous murders or wars. But that doesnt make them porn obviously. For example a childrens clothing catalogue might give Gary Glitter and several thousand other perverts a thrill but its not porn unless its intended to arouse otherwise Mothercare would be busted for obscene images. Thats not a legal definition btw I am just going by the dictionary definition of porn. If we want to get into what constitutes an indecent image then thats a whole new discussion.

PS

Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2003 8:25 pm
by magoo
A snuff movie made for non sexual reasons. Like numerous amounts of news footage of war from the last 20 years you mean. If that happened to excite some odd person it wouldnt make it porn. You see what I mean?

Sorry to labour the point. I might have misunderstood the point you were trying to make. Its all those open ended sentences you use...................................................they get me confused.............