Page 4 of 6

Re: Anal ....Why?

Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2003 7:44 pm
by Jack Andjill
My girlfriend said to me on our first ngiht together: no anal, no watersports. Fair enough, I thought. Former intrigued me, the latter didn't. A few weeks later, I suggested anal, we tried it, and we now both love it. She's as surprised as I am.

Just thought I'd share that with you.

Re: Anal ....Why?

Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2003 7:48 pm
by golostruda
I can't be arsed to read the replies so I'm sure it's already been pointed out, but it's because most people of artistic bent (eg porn directors) are either gay or repressed gay. The same way that male fashion designers put women in clothes designed with pre-pubescent boys in mind, porn directors - faced with a perfectly serviceable female orifice - opt to focus on the one more normally associated with gay sex to try to come to terms with their own homosexuality.

Re: Anal ....Why?

Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2003 7:59 pm
by jj
Talk about false premises !! Having watched a good deal of porn, only a blind man would posit that porn directors (with rare exceptions) are in any sense 'artistic'. So that's that out of the way, then.....what's next? An anal penchant is inflienced by which star-sign one is born under ?
And why go to the trouble of pointing out that you're so secure in your own misconceptions that you don't need to read anyone else's possibly better-informed comments?

Re: Anal ....Why?

Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2003 8:26 pm
by deSade
Blimey, I had no idea we had such a bunch of baptists here....

Personally I like sex to be dirty...anal is great....far more interesting than endless vanilla pussy sex. Put it together with some watersports and you have the basis of a really excellent filth flick in my opinion.

I think the appeal is this: straigt sex you can have anytime, it's the more extreme stuff you don't get to experience so often, therefore it has the forbidden fruit element.

Ben is my hero becuase he has shown us so many gorgeous girlies doing the butt thang.

Each to their own...

Re: Anal ....Why? Golustruda

Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2003 8:31 pm
by One Eyed Jack
I don't know whether your post is a valid comment, but I've heard this argument before about the interest in anal linked with the homosexuality thing. If I was in anyway inclined to agree, I would but frankly when I'm fucking a girl in the bum, she in no way reminds me of what it would be like fucking a guy in the arse. I would have no interest fucking a guy in the arse pure and simply because the male sex holds no attraction to me the way a womans body does. The kind of guy who would go for that would most likely be bi sexual anyway.

I'm sure if a dick could fit in a womans nostril or ear hole, someone would do a multiple penetrative film on this also. Does that make them less straight? Sure, now I think of it, there are some exceptions to your argument, but lets not generalise here or this whole thread will go off on a different tangent altogether.

Re: Anal ....Why?

Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2003 11:30 am
by Gentleman Jim
I'm ticking the box marked "anti", and am nostalgic for a more innocent (!) time when Mr Dover's studs didn't ream the talent in every movie.

Re: Anal ....Why?

Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2003 12:25 pm
by Shinryu
DeSade, or TheGod, I don't know which is more apt.

You have hit the nail on the head. People on this board don't seem to realize the reason why xxx movies were invented in the first place was to shock and entertain and remove the fear of sexual isolation. Without xxx movies, people feel that they are the only one to have the fantasies that they do. Mainstream society wishes for people to think that there is only one type of sex worth talking about: in marriage and missionary. All else is filthy and sinful.

Some people don't want to see generic sex on film. Some people want to be shocked and entertained. People don't pay money to see The Lord of the Rings in order to see something mundane, they wish to be shocked. People don't read Stephen King novels to be bored, they wish to be shocked. Adult videos should be as ambitious in pushing boundaries as all other mediums are. In sex you have a difference in opinion just like you do in music. Only a fool would suggest that heavy metal should not exist simply because some prefer jazz or classical. Why should there only be jazz sex? Why can't heavy metal sex be tolerated the same as heavy metal music?

With the old maids who claim to be fans of xxx bitching about how "unseemly" it is, the "religious" censor-happy groups must be laughing their asses off and planning their next strike against our freedom-- since even "fans" are complaining about the "indecency."

Remember, a house divided can't stand. Those who hate xxx ain't divided, why the f--- are we?

[img]http://www.obscurelinks.com/max_hardcor ... ex/005.jpg[/img]


Re: Anal ....Why? Golustruda

Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2003 12:55 pm
by golostruda
My post may have been a little tongue-in-cheek (facecheek not bumcheek) but clearly are some pornsters with an odd attitude to the female sex that yer average psychologist might perceive as repressed homosexuality, mentioning no names of cowboy hat wearing Americans called Max.

However, I think the issue here revolves around the porn directors themselves tiring of sex. Once you've shagged a couple of hundred women on film up the pussy, sure you're going to try and find alterative orifices to keep yourself entertained.

The problem is that the punter seems to be being ignored in all of this. Your average porn buyer probably won't have had a similar wealth of sexual encounters, will probably only meet one or two women in his life who will take it up the wrong 'un (even if he wants do her up it), but that doesn't mean the punter is obssessed with seeing anal on film. The same way most punters probably won't shag blonde identical twins in their life. Yes, it's nice to watch it happen on film, but not every scene in every film.

It seems the obssession with anal sex lies with the producers and directors, not the punters or their 'voice' of sorts, the industry journalists and reviewers. Take the case of US porn girl Aurora Snow who appeared on the scene a couple of years ago, refusing to do anal sex or anything much more than standard 1m/1f or 2f scenes. She was pretty much universally acclaimed as the hottest, cutest, sweetest, most natural and girl-next-door girl to have emerged in years. Nine months later when she had sunk to taking two cocks up her ass in every film, everybody lost interest.

When the anal craze first began box cover flashes promising "100% Anal" and "All Anal" certainly caught the eye of the browsing consumer. Now when 99.9% of films (excluding the women only ones) offer that, I just wish a producer would have the courage to start issuing films with similar flashes promising "No Anal Whatsover". I think they would be surprised at the success of such a product.

Yes, you can bang on about how hardcore should be more than just vanilla sex, but after several years of nothing but chocolate, I for one quite fancy a few scoops of vanilla now.

Re: Anal ....Why?

Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2003 1:21 pm
by Angel Long
Hey all you sexy mother fuckers!

Its me the horny bitch, I ain?t read all the above as I?m sat on set and ain?t got time.

But I just wanted to let you know that I love the anal sex in films.I love the nastyness of it. and would rather do anal than have my pussy fucked. It makes me cum more!!! When I get fucked in the arse it makes my pussy and arse cum .....it?s great!!!

Gotta go, as they?re shouting 4 my mouth round the nice cock Ive gotta suck.....lovely?!!

Have fun,stay hard and always keep wanking!!!!

Love

Angel Long

Re: Anal ....Why?

Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2003 1:27 pm
by Shinryu
Angel, adopt me, please.