WTF is going on with GlamourFinder?

The 'Promotions' forum is for the posting of promotional material relating to the British adult entertainment industry, as well as the seeking and commissioning of work by models and producers working in the British adult entertainment industry.
The Toybox
Posts: 936
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

NOW GLAMOURFINDER BANS BBW's...

Post by The Toybox »

Reach for the Special K!!!

...now GlamourFinder will NOT ALLOW YOU AS A MEMBER IF YOU ARE A BBW.

It's not open to discussion, it's right there on the joinup page, so remember, GLAMOURFINDER DOES NOT WANT YOU AS A MEMBER IF THEY DO NOT APPROVE OF YOUR SIZE.

So if you put on a couple of pounds over Christmas, you should probably MAIL THE SITE OWNERS to check if you still fall within their weight restrictions. If they find out that you are over their (unspecified) weight limits (perhaps by reading your private internal mail, or searching around on the web and finding you mentioned on another site) you can expect to be unceremoniously RUBBED OUT :-)

Nob3y
Posts: 2084
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: NOW GLAMOURFINDER BANS BBW's...

Post by Nob3y »

I think the term "lost the plot" applies to those in charge at glamour finder

I wonder if they would come on this site and explain their thinking behind all these new rules and whos idea it was to read all messages,and why they think its a good idea?

Born to Lose..... Live to Win
videokim
Posts: 2985
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: to Kim re GlamourFinder

Post by videokim »

They have cut out swinging & parties as well to go in line with other model web-sites, Pure Storm also read my e-mails & i was banned even though i had filled in my profile to their specs so they all work the same really.
Most model sites advertise Pro models on their main page but Glamour Finder advertises the most popular be it Am or Pro, i receive lots of mail on GF & also message lots of models in return without any problem so i can't judge them like some of you.
Because of serious criminal e-mails we received on Model Heaven years ago it sparked off a big police case which is still being watched now amongst sites so maybe they are safe guarding themselves against similar offences, we always ask people to e-mail our addy rather than rely on talking business on sites messenger services.
As for looking dodgy is a silly remark as people who know us also know we are 100% genuine & a sites polices have nothing to do with people on it otherwise everyone on Pure Storm would be shunned by now.

Kim x
Kims Amateurs The original & still the best UK amateurs...often imitated never equalled

https://twitter.com/bustykim
https://twitter.com/kimsamateurs
[email]videokim69@hotmail.com[/email]
[email]videokim69@gmail
The Toybox
Posts: 936
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: to Kim re GlamourFinder

Post by The Toybox »

Kim, your points are well taken.

Now check out what GlamourFinder has done next, and see if that suits you equally well :-) :-)

Ron T. Storm
Posts: 2593
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: NOW GLAMOURFINDER BANS BBW's...

Post by Ron T. Storm »

That actually comes under discrimination. I think any woman could bring that up in a legal court. Seems he owner of glamourfinder has a mental issue.
Ron T. Storm
Posts: 2593
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: NOW GLAMOURFINDER BANS BBW's...

Post by Ron T. Storm »

Whoops my positng is towards the anti BBW thing on glamourfinder.. not you Nob3y.
Nob3y
Posts: 2084
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: NOW GLAMOURFINDER BANS BBW's...

Post by Nob3y »

Well I am a bit of a large lad and am quite mental !!
but I knew you didnt mean Me !!

Born to Lose..... Live to Win
TheKinkyMinx
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: WTF is going on with GlamourFinder?

Post by TheKinkyMinx »

After reading this I checked my own GF profile and have found it has been deleted!

So judging by this -
GF's policy has recently been re-focused. We are now accepting new models (amateur and professional) based on the following:
Youth (18-39)
Slim (not BBW)
Commercially mainstream attractive

I fit the age range (I'm 35), lets also say (as I am told every day) that I am indeed attractive but... oh wait for it 'SLIM' , no I wouldnt call myself THAT! As a size 16 I'm certainly no twig, so I have been 'deleted' due to my size - isnt that just blatant discrimination? They are banning anyone who is bigger than a size 14 - what a fucking disgrace!

The Toybox
Posts: 936
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

LEAVE GLAMOURFINDER.COM NOW!!!

Post by The Toybox »

They've gone F*CKIN' INSANE!!!

Now you CAN'T GET ON IF YOU'RE 40?

Let's mail EVERYBODY WE KNOW and tell them -

LEAVE GLAMOURFINDER.COM NOW!!!!

Ron T. Storm
Posts: 2593
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: LEAVE GLAMOURFINDER.COM NOW!!!

Post by Ron T. Storm »

Already doing that after your advice. Wow. How to fuck up a website in one week. They done a great job at killing it.

Locked