Page 4 of 7

Re: Should we name no shows and timewasters?

Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 11:21 pm
by Benson_Media
SHIT! I thought I was the only saddo working at this time in the morning (4am in mainland Europe..)


Re: Should we name no shows and timewasters?

Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 11:29 pm
by Benson_Media
I'm doing Tigerr's Saturday update cos her crappy Brussels Airlines flight was delayed out of Birmingham. The air traffic controllers went on strike.

Remember strikes? Belgium. Think 70's Britain.

Rendering..rendering...


Re: Should we name no shows and timewasters?

Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 11:41 pm
by Benson_Media
LOL. OEJ

The name of the beast: 33

shhhhhhhhhhhh!


Re: Should we name no shows and timewasters?

Posted: Sat Sep 26, 2009 10:04 am
by one eyed jack
So Im not sure if you want it or not. I think you all do or maybe ther eis resentment that UKAP should have it, its open season if someone wants to run it as that is how UKAP is run anyway, people take charge of somethign and see it through.

You dont have to be memebrs but it would be great if it was centralised under the hub of a producers association than just appear on any ones specific site.

Also I noticed a lot of people have viewed the post on UKAP but only a few have voted (all yes)

Whats up with that? Its no wonder things rarely happen in the development of the adult business.

As Stormchild said it goes both ways, which is what i already said throughout.

Or maybe no one really wants it to happen as the responses on here are a bit ambiguous. Just vote. We can iron out details later if it happens.


Re: Should we name no shows and timewasters?

Posted: Sat Sep 26, 2009 10:22 am
by Twingo
[quote]Also I noticed a lot of people have viewed the post on UKAP but only a few have voted (all yes)[/quote]

Last time i checked the link, you had to be a member of the UKAP forum before you could vote, guests weren't allowed, because of this a lot of people are not going to take the effort to signup just to make a vote.

You also made a post earlier on BGAFD about the results of the condom only poll on UKAP but again only members of UKAP can see the post you linked to, which is why i believe almost nobody made any comments on your BGAFD post.

Maybe just worth checking any future posts, to make sure guests like myself and maybe others can see what your linking to :)

Re: Should we name no shows and timewasters?

Posted: Sat Sep 26, 2009 10:44 am
by one eyed jack
Very valid point Twingo

But unlike the BGAFD I dont really trust the integrity of votes from faceless posters which is why we rarely get troll like activity there and rarely ever had to moderate the forum for malicious comments.

If you are a producer why wouldnt you want to be known on the forum? We dont have to know your real name but we do need to validate if you are a genuine producer or what would be the point? When we have industry network parties, this means that anyone could get in if they say they made videos when we know a lot of people who want to know what goes on dont really care about the industry or the business of it anyway.

If this is the case then Ill just tout for opinions from the industry names on our facebook as obviously they may not be worth nish here.

Thanks for pointing this out though.


Re: Should we name no shows and timewasters?

Posted: Sat Sep 26, 2009 11:21 am
by one eyed jack
Anyway what difference does it make? Im not sure by the posts here if anyone does want to do this or not.


Re: Should we name no shows and timewasters?

Posted: Sat Sep 26, 2009 11:53 am
by Alexandra
Hi Terry,

I think some of the posts on this thread demonstrate clearly why a naming & shaming forum won?t work!

Namely people will use it for point-scoring, irrelevant gossiping & personal grudges. I won?t even waste my time dealing with pathetic posts from one-man-band, desperate tog (SB) with delusions of grandeur.

Also if people start making allegations without any evidence? it could get very expensive! Bottom line? there?s always 2 sides to any story & unless one side has irrefutable documentary evidence. It?s basically just one person?s opinion!

And this alleged incident was at party a year ago? you messaged me via about a month ago on Facebook ? I thought we?d resolved this? In fact you asked me if I would be interested in working with you if you ever came out (performing) retirement.

But back to the purpose of this forum? I?ve never no showed, I?ve always arrived prepared & brought whatever the tog requested, & did everything that was agreed in the confirmation email(s).