Re: Photography Rights
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 11:20 am
'The photo's on the site are under license to us as they were taken by a professional "Newspaper" photographer that was at the PornPartyLive in 2008. These said images have been given to us as has permision to use them on the site.'
OK...Prove it. Email me the photographers details you claim to have the original photos and rights to said photos. Here are larger photos from the day of some you have on your site (in smaller versions) and others taken on same day YOU DO NOT HAVE because Vicki's Jim took them....he took all of them.
[img]http://www.nude2rude.com/images/2008L/_00019.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.nude2rude.com/images/2008L/_00022.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.nude2rude.com/images/2008L/_00027.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.nude2rude.com/images/2008L/_00042.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.nude2rude.com/images/2008L/_00050.jpg[/img]
We have tried to avoid total confrontation regarding the matter of the photos used within your gallery of the models know as Vicki Peach and Kaz B as taken by her Vicki's spouse Jim *******.
www.nude2rude.com purchased the photographer and model's rights for these photos a while back and we have the full set of photos that we know you do not have.
We are here posting several watermarked photos that have never been released from the same party by the same photographer which we have a licence to use as 'Behind The Scenes' media for www.nude2rude.com and its associated websites. This is to show ownership. Also due to owning the original photographs we can prove by Exif Camera Data ownership due to having the originals which you will not be able to...and don't bother trying to rebrand the photos we are posting as all Exif Data is removed to be saved for use in The Small Claims Court.
Would you like to proceed with legal action? We are happy to provide our solicitor's details to your solicitor. Hopefully this will not happen and sense will be seen,
Regards,
Matthew aka Stormchild69
OK...Prove it. Email me the photographers details you claim to have the original photos and rights to said photos. Here are larger photos from the day of some you have on your site (in smaller versions) and others taken on same day YOU DO NOT HAVE because Vicki's Jim took them....he took all of them.
[img]http://www.nude2rude.com/images/2008L/_00019.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.nude2rude.com/images/2008L/_00022.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.nude2rude.com/images/2008L/_00027.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.nude2rude.com/images/2008L/_00042.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.nude2rude.com/images/2008L/_00050.jpg[/img]
We have tried to avoid total confrontation regarding the matter of the photos used within your gallery of the models know as Vicki Peach and Kaz B as taken by her Vicki's spouse Jim *******.
www.nude2rude.com purchased the photographer and model's rights for these photos a while back and we have the full set of photos that we know you do not have.
We are here posting several watermarked photos that have never been released from the same party by the same photographer which we have a licence to use as 'Behind The Scenes' media for www.nude2rude.com and its associated websites. This is to show ownership. Also due to owning the original photographs we can prove by Exif Camera Data ownership due to having the originals which you will not be able to...and don't bother trying to rebrand the photos we are posting as all Exif Data is removed to be saved for use in The Small Claims Court.
Would you like to proceed with legal action? We are happy to provide our solicitor's details to your solicitor. Hopefully this will not happen and sense will be seen,
Regards,
Matthew aka Stormchild69