egafd.com

thanks snow got there in the end lol hollyxx

holly xx wrote:

> thanks snow got there in the end lol hollyxx

Yeah... I WASNT being funny before...

I was just 'frustrated' regarding females ' inability' to post pics...

i no hun but now am sorted big thanks at least am trying hun hollyxx

I'll make a request

More Delta White, thats one girl who yup, I wish my girlfriend was a freak like her heheheh

[img]http://www.rgbphotohost.com/images/Image00285.jpg[/img]


one two testing

For the determined technophobes, I've added help on how to cut and paste !happy!

I don't mind if anyone leaves my link off - I'll just make a mental note and harbour a grudge for ever !whistle!

and Myson, use your own bloody server!! !laugh!

[img]http://www.rgbphotohost.com/images/lala1_081.jpg[/img]
Picture hosting courtesy of UKPussyTalk.com


Sweet !happy!

The only way to fix the name problem is rename the files, it really is only way

I have spent 5 months correcting things and making my code work.

Something like

mt_srand ((double) microtime() * 1000000);
$raname = mt_rand();

Works small scale, once you get 10-20 people online all at once, that breaks pretty quickly, and you have to go alphanimerical, so make an md5 of the $raname+originalname and take the first 8-12 characters of the result, that will stand most things

Cenobitez wrote:

> The only way to fix the name problem is rename the files, it
> really is only way

We are working on a different scale here. Only a handful of people use this a day never mind 10 to 20 simultaneously.

At the moment, I don't have a naming problem other than compatibility with the BB code used on here - ie replacing spaces with %20 and detecting characters like "["

I check for duplicate file names by scanning the directory with a glob() routine and invite the user to rename his file - not very elegant, or user friendly, but it's working for the moment. I can implement random name generation, like you suggest, when I start getting a lot of names like pic01.jpg and DSCF0001.jpg submitted.

I'll only spend time on it according to how much people use it. I'm not expecting a financial return on it - it's just to help performers post easy-to-see images of themselves for both their benefit and that of would be bookers.

With issues like the [1] and other random things, makes it easier to control the names yourself, and saves on server overheads

I used to generate thumbnails, intermediate size (640 wide/tall), and original size live too, then found out it was easyer to create them on upload.

I started out as a place to host my own photos to post online then girls was asking me, and before you know it I had 1,000 photos hosted heh, so wait for the snowball to change from ball to avalanche