Page 4 of 6
Re: Streaming Video
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2005 4:25 pm
by Phil mCc
Loads of great stuff, Censoring the Internet may well have been debated but having spoke to ofcom they don't want the job. Technically it would virtually imposible without agreement fron the servers, having spoke with most of the big servers, they are going the oposite way by allowing multi cast coz if they don't they will get left behind. Our indication has been Ofcom would leave it up to police who say if it not of criminal content the could not justify getting involved. Cenorship debates always use beastality issuse new strait forward porn, they are more interested in Fraud. It costs buttons to set-up....you guys are wrong about the DVD theory...You wanna have a pull, so you go down the sex-shop and have it later....The whole point it is 24x7
The DRM is there as a deterant and to control payment gateway... The idea is on a TV not a PC.....Forget your Computers for a minute..
Sit down choose from a selection and buy direct from the producer..In fact buy it Live, Join the likes of McC, Ben, Marino live on a shoot, the ability to watch the deflowering of a Virgins ass in Hi-Definition// naw your right it will never catch on.
Re: Streaming Video
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2005 8:20 pm
by Digi-Guy
In which case in no time you'll be a rich man living in a big house with many cars drinking champers and thanking the day IPTV was created.
Good Luck
DG
And to think they said the world was round?
Re: Streaming Video
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2005 11:09 pm
by randyandy
What's the Internet Watch Foundation's remit?
Re: Streaming Video
Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2005 7:17 am
by Styx
Not in the slightest, I intend to extend the application into other areas.
So what if someone cracks it? Only a few can do that or will even want to go to the trouble.
If you own a shop selling goods you put in security to prevent shoplifters...it doesn't mean it will be 100% effective all the time...but it's better than throwing the doors open and letting everyone take what they want.
What's the alternative? Distribute dvd's that are even more easily ripped? All the hassle of duplicating and order fulfilment?
Kev
Re: Streaming Video
Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2005 8:45 am
by Phil mCc
Spot on Kev, most of my customers want to pay, they never haggle etc. In fact I have got some that just send some cash and ask for anything new.
Its not the guy who downloads and keeps it,,, Its the cunt at the carboot selling to those who don'rt know how to copy or source it..If everyone was clever enought to work out how to steal it then how come Piracy takes $100milion out of the production houses a year...
The point is appart from a few "The sky's falling" people everyone else knows it what the public wants. On demand, on TV or on PC, password protected, 24x7
Digi I am not doing it for the money,
Still not read a comment about the live deflowering of a virgin ass,,,was it so "nail on the head everyone rushed off to their video stash....So how much would you pay to watch and interact with that...
Phil McC
Re: Streaming Video
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 7:15 am
by Riley
Lip service to a problem or are they starting to look at internet porn and some of the more obscene Genre but what level will they go down to.
Re: Streaming Video
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 8:26 am
by eroticartist
Hi Riley,
The Home Office cracked down on me in 1983 when I produced the Rich & Randy series. It featured SM as practised by the rich. A particular character was the colonel played by Frank Thring with a public schoolboy accent. ( I wonder if anyone has a copy ?)
The danger is when cracking down and censoring violent and abusive images the state does not make the depiction of SM illegal. SM is a consensual form of sexual play whereas abuse seems to depict unwilling performers.
As a filmmaker I don't want to make films depicting violent abuse but I do want to make films of the SM genre. The Home office talks about playful fetishism, but what does this mean?
Mike Freeman
Re: Streaming Video
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 8:56 am
by Riley
Perhpas the new proposals will fill in the grey areas but as usual it will probably be broad sweeping statements that at someones expense of financial or liberty loss that the wigs in the courts will have the final say as they do now. Interperatation is 9/10s of the law !!!
Re: Streaming Video
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 9:22 am
by randyandy
Hiya
'Found this' :
http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/docs/r18video.html
Thought it worth a read. In a way it gives 'guidance' on what 'they' feel can be produced.
Not going to get in a debate about it, say it's right or anything it's just for info.
Andy