Page 4 of 6

Re: Quentin Tarantino gets annoyed at Channel 4 news..

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 12:18 am
by one eyed jack
Actually Altruist, scrub that. I just googled it. its no secret the script was leaked on the net so thats not proof at all.

In fact I dont need to prove anything at all to you. Youre just crass and offensive and wont admit it.


Re: Quentin Tarantino gets annoyed at Channel 4 news..

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 12:25 am
by one eyed jack
Maybe it was the way you protested that you'd seen it on pirate instead of calmly saying that you saw a preview screening

What the hell are you smoking??? Where did i say that!? i didnt see a preview screening at all. You might want to read through again. I saw it last Saturday night at the 02!!!

I could even prove it with the ?9 parking charged to my card and how do you determine I am not calm???


Re: Quentin Tarantino gets annoyed at Channel 4 news..

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 12:57 am
by one eyed jack
I'm pretty sure Miramax wouldn't allow someone to show you the screener copy producer or not. If someone did do that then they would more than likely get fired. They certainly wouldn't have been allowed to lend it to you.


Ok.....Read my posts clearly. "I have a mainstream producer friend who was given a copy on DVD from the Miramax office. This is not unusual. I neither stated I was going to borrow it as you are right about it not being lent out to unauthorised people he did however offer me to screen it at his home. He gets screeners all the time and never once have I asked to borrow them because Im a fan of seeing films on the big screen. My facebook statuses can prove that.

Why are you so obsessed with the notion of me downloading the film illegally. You looking for dirt on me? You got it I shoot porn films. What more do you want? I normally dont expect an apology from people who offend me because it tells me they have already judged me by virtue of what I do.

The fact you dont know me but are quite adamant I am lying and still not proved by cutting and pasting this comment you allege I made says all I need to know about you as a person.

What is it? Iz it cos I iz black?


Is the film any good?

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:03 am
by max_tranmere
I might go and see it, but I've heard it's the most violent film Tarantino has ever made (and that's saying something) so it might be unpleasant to see. I find Reservour Dogs disturbing and if Django Unchained is more extreme than that then I might not bother. Also, is the story any good?

Re: Quentin Tarantino gets annoyed at Channel 4 news..

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:18 am
by one eyed jack
If you like westerns then you might like it. If you hate Tarantino dont bother


ATTN: The Altruist

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:45 am
by one eyed jack
Im still waiting for The Altruist to cut and paste from my posts where I stated I saw Django Unchained ahead of release


Re: Quentin Tarantino gets annoyed at Channel 4 news..

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:13 am
by thealtruist
I'm sorry that you are offended as much you are. That was not my intention. I pointed out something that didn't (and still doesn't) make any sense to me. If anyone was crass it was you because of the way you've gone off on one.

Read my post. You posted on the 13th which was the night of a preview screening at the O2. It wasn't released until the 18th. That's five days before the official release date. Maybe I did make an unfair assumption. Maybe I didn't. Your post does read as though you'd seen it.

A parking ticket don't prove anything.

I never said you downloaded it. I said you'd watched it.

If I had a problem with porn I wouldn't be on an adult forum site, would I? I don't have a problem with you shooting porn. When I say people like you I mean hypocrites. I'm not out to dig any dirt on you. Believe it or not I don't have any problems with you. i just get annoyed at people, regardless of their profession, who preach one thing but do it themselves. Film and producers bang on about illegal downloading but am pretty sure they watch porn on tube sites or download it because it doesn't affect them. I'm sure a lot of producers do the same. That was the whole point. What I don't understand is why you're very easily offended by this. Practically frothing at the mouth. It's not that big a deal. If you'd have been calm about it I would've apologised but you're protestations aren't doing you that many favours. You doth protest too much.

Being black didn't even cross my mind. The fact that you are is irrelevant. Don't make me out to be a racist because I'm not. Race is nothing to do with it.

Re: Quentin Tarantino gets annoyed at Channel 4 news..

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:22 am
by thealtruist
It's a very good film, Max. I don't think his films are that violent. This one isn't. The violence in the film is comical and cartoonish. Deliberately over the top.

I really don't like Tarantino because, as someone pointed out, he just nicks everything and calls it an "homage". And I personally found "Resrvoir Dogs", "Pulp Fiction" and "Jackie Brown" awful, boring films. All this putting his films into chapters and the messing the order of the film around does nothing for me. I think he works best when he's not trying to be serious. "Kill Bill", "Inglourious Basterds" and "Django Unchained" are superb films. Yes, the majority of the stuff is nicked and called an "homage" but still fun all the same.

Re: ATTN: The Altruist

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:26 am
by thealtruist
Still waiting for you to re read my post where I said you'd posted FIVE DAYS BEFORE the official release date. You talked abut the bag scene and how it was funny. The whole tone of your post makes it sound as though you'd seen it.

Re: ATTN: The Altruist

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:30 am
by thealtruist
One Eyed Jack wrote: "I cant see that going down to well here can you ? !laugh!

That scene was hilarious though and I agree...The film is nothing short of genius but thats what i like about Tarantino movies, He has his own style. Who cares about historical accuracy in big screen movies? I go to be entertained."

I point out to notable sentences. "That scene WAS hilarous and It's nothing short of genius".

How could you come to that conclusion if you hadn't seen it? The whole tone of the thing reads as though you'd seen it.