egafd.com

What I would like to know is, who is filming those lycrists?

Frank, consider yourself suitably scolded, mocked and chastised, by the OT Forum's self elected, "Chief ?of Thought Police" for your complaint against cyclists, who are considered by him and his "Enforcement Officers" to be a "Sainted group". To Marxists (Although they might not realise they are), a "Sainted group" is a section of society that is considered to be Politically Correct or "Right-on" and as such can do no wrong. You are experiencing a tiny example of what it must be like living in North ?Korea or perhaps an echo of the old Soviet Union where such an utterance against a "Sainted group" could have had you locked up and tortured.

Sainted Groups, that you are not permitted to make negative comments about , regardless of their actions, on the OT forum are:

Cyclists, union leaders, New Labour politicians, councillors, activists; the disabled, vegetarians, anyone who works in the public sector (Even fatcat managers) clowns, puppeteers, African dictators, animal rights activists and ANYONE who protests against an elected government, that is NOT New Labour.

Welcome to the crazy, twisted, blind and intransigent world of Political Correctness, Frank. In this World, if a deranged, vegetarian, New Labour supporter, dressed as a clown, with dread-locks, took to a bicycle armed with a Kalashnikov ( A Politically Correct weapon) and opened fire in a shopping mall, killing dozens of people, you would NOT be allowed to voice a complaint on the OT forum. Why? Because the Thought Police would deem the victims, being shoppers in a Mall, "Agents of Capitalism", probably Daily Mail readers and as such merely worthless pawns ?about whom the perpetrator probably had a "Genuine grievance!"?

The gunman would be considered the, "Victim", for no other reason than his apparent political views, ?ie being on a cycle, dressed as a clown and wearing dread-locks, he must be "Right on " and can't possibly be, "That bad!" The plight of the actual victims in the Mall would be tossed aside as worthless, as are the pedestrian victims of lunatic cyclists. The OT Thought Police are saying that you, Frank, are being, "Unreasonable" complaining about being bullied off the footpath, by ignorant cyclists. In their view the cyclist is a valiant Socialist Eco Warrior, fighting against the brutal regime of the motor car and as a pedestrian you are just a worthless wanker! You are evidently not, "Sainted!"?

Furthermore, the Thought ?Police wont even concede?that your complaint has been borne out of a genuine personal experience you may have had. No, you must have read something Jeremy Clarkson must have said. Clarkson must have corrupted your views. Talk about good 'ol totalitarianism alive and kicking on the OT forum. Always blaming, "Corrupt outside influences" for any dissent! You'll hear this from every brutal regime from the Chinese to the Iranians, to Mugabe's murderous thugs, when "justifying" opening fire on protestors!

Anyway, a good example of dangerous, mass, selective blindness, was when New Labour brought in tuition fees for students, there was not a murmur from student activists. However, when the Coalition even discussed the topic, the students were rioting in the streets. In fact there was not one complaint from students during the entire, corrupt, warmongering folly of 13 years of New Labour. This is how NL under Blair could preside over the most crooked, sleaze ridden government in the ?history of Parliament, because they knew that their followers were gagged and bound by both political correctness and fear, so no one would ever dare protest against any Draconian measure or assault on basic freedoms that NL introduced.?

This is how crook Tony Blair, helped start an illegal war with a Texan madman and amass ?20,000,000 (at the last count) without one word of complaint from New Labour followers. If he'd been a Tory and done this, the PC brigade would have been baying for his blood.

Another example, is New Labour screaming hysterically at the Coalition, about ?the scandal of relaxed passport controls and asylum seekers. What a cheek! Even to bring up these topics for discussion under New Labour would have had you booted out of the Party for racism! Selective blindness.

Returning to the topic of "Cyclists", however, this so called, "Sainted" group may not be as sainted as the PC brigade might think. There is a good chance that these arrogant, ?wankers, ?on expensive mountain bikes that hurtle around the city wearing their stupid hats and Lycra, are actually..........Tory stock brokers, bankers and lawyers, NOT New Labour, social workers! Some of these bikes cost ?thousands!

What a dilemma!! Yes, come to think of it, isn't David Cameron a cyclist? I think it might be time for the OT Forum's Thought Police to convene a meeting and perhaps re-classify cyclists is this way:

Amendent A/ Cyclists on expensive mountain bikes, wearing Lycra and cycling in A,B social group areas, will be now deemed an, "Enemy of Future State" and from henceforth, rightly criticised, chastised and mocked!

Amendment B/ Cyclists on bicycles with bells, wearing parkas and their hair in dreadlocks underneath funny knitted hats with baubles hanging off them, will be deemed, "Sainted!" Furthermore, wimmin dressed as the above, towing their children behind in little carts on busy roads, in spite of the reckless danger posed to their offspring will be deemed, " Eco Earth ?Mothers of Socialist Values" and as such, "Double Sainted".

?Exceptions, will be the traitorous Mums of Richmond, Surrey, who are in reality, wealthy, Enemies of Future State, only disguised as Right-On "Wimmin" and probably have a ?50,000 Range Rover at home. (This is actually true! Lol)

So Frank, you been warned, before posting on the OT forum in future, kindly refer to the above list of PC Sainted Groups! There are many more than I have mentioned, so be very, very, careful! You don't want your knuckles rapped again do you, or in an ideal World for the OT Thought Police, your knuckles broken! The OT TP nannies are ever vigilant and they sleep not!

A dilemma for the OT Tought Police.....A Tory cyclist. Must we hate him for being a Tory, but also like him for being a cyclist?

[img]http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2008/08/ ... 24x320.jpg[/img]

A perfectly correct, "Right on " New Labour cyclist on his way to the "Annual Bookworm and Clown & Puppet Workshop Event"

[img]http://www.marybicycles.com/wp-content/ ... 06/cat.jpg[/img]




?

Err, you okay Jimbo?

"But the next time I see you getting worked up on this forum about some aspect of modern society that pisses you off, I will try and respond with the same mildly sacrcastic and irreverent quip !!"

I look forward to it!

Have a good weekend, Frank
D

Just to check that I have understood your political essay...

You don't like cyclists or the New Labour government?

Have I got that right?

Okey dokey, fair enough, each to their own.

Cheers
D

Worst of all are new labour cyclists! Always veering to the right !adolf!

Holy shit. Someone phone Jim up and tell him Officer Dibble knows his password for the bgafd forums.

So, let me get this right:

1. You don't believe speeding causes accidents (like Jeremy Clarkson).
2. You believe cyclists became a bigger menace to people when the speed limit for motorists was reduced (contradicting #1).
3. You believe the speed limit was reduced and cyclists are to blame for this (despite and at handiwork providing evidence that it was more likely to reduce the number of deer killed).
4. You believe all cyclists to be vegetarians (despite them needing more protein and iron due to increased muscle activity).
5. You believe that the 9/11 horror was organised by the USA because of some long-term plan to acquire oil (despite America has just as much untapped oil as the Middle East).
6. You believe people shouldn't get the flu jab as it's a money-making scam (but spending 10 times as much on porn would be an wise decision).


I'm still wondering how you've not fitted-up veggie-eating cyclists for 9/11 and the Swine Flu outbreak yet. I'm sure given the right drugs in copious quantities you'll work it all out.

"Worst of all are new labour cyclists! Always veering to the right "

Nah, worst of all are Lib Dem cyclists! Pointing in all directions at the same time. Total nightmare that's impossible to second guess.