Page 4 of 5

Re: Bin Laden

Posted: Wed May 04, 2011 2:19 pm
by Flat_Eric
turanhosting wrote:

>>


.... at which point the tinfoil-hat brigade would have (very predictably) started claiming it was a fake / lookalike and not Bin Laden, so does it really make any difference?

My guess is that photos will eventually emerge, probably sooner rather than later. But then it'll be "why has it taken this long ... etc".

The sceptics will always believe what they want to believe no matter what, so once again, it will make no real difference.

- Eric


Dynatech

Posted: Wed May 04, 2011 5:25 pm
by David Johnson
So your answer to my question of you

"Are you going to have a go at answering my question as to why Bush didnt invent the story 2 weeks before the last American election? Or alternatively why didn't Obama invent the story before the US mid term election?"

Implicitly, your answer is no.

Fine. I won't waste any more of my time

Ta
D

Re: Dynatech

Posted: Wed May 04, 2011 6:20 pm
by dynatech
How would I know? A lie is a lie. The puppet-masters in the CIA are the ones to ask as to timing.
Ask them what all this was about too whilst you're at it:
http://www.darkpolitricks.com/2011/05/f ... den-video/


Re: Dynatech

Posted: Wed May 04, 2011 6:36 pm
by David Johnson
I am not suggesting that you are inside the CIA, but if you have a theory that Bin Laden's assassination a couple of days ago was invented, how come you find it so hard to have a theory as to why now as opposed to much more politically advantageous times i.e. the last election and the mid term election under Obama?

Cheers
D

Re: Dynatech

Posted: Wed May 04, 2011 7:43 pm
by dynatech
Who is to say when they deem one time more advantageous than another? Presidents are as much sponsered into office over there as voted, Bush had served his term and served his purpose - imperialism needed a black face to show "thangs done changed" (except they haven't really) and make things look progressive (and perhaps slightly more agreeable to those oil or mineral nations yet to be conquered). Right now is not just advantageous for Barry's popularity with the American voters, it gives them impetus to both change their schtick in Pakistan & Afghanistan to a degree, and then start to apply this mindset to new bogeymen in new places - places like Libya & Syria, for instance.


Re: Dynatech

Posted: Wed May 04, 2011 8:04 pm
by David Johnson
Maybe you should ask yourself why you are so quick to question Bin Laden's death and say it's fake with an almost religious fervour, condemning people like myself for not taking a similar view, but totally unquestioning about why this fakery has happened now.

Cheers
D

Re: Bin Laden

Posted: Wed May 04, 2011 8:22 pm
by Flat_Eric
turanhosting wrote:

>>


You mean like there were all those images from New York on 9/11 (not to mention the world watching event unfold on live TV), hundreds of eyewitnesses testifying that they saw an airliner hit the Pentagon .... and yet 10 years later there's **still** a massive consipracy industry that's been built up around the event, with people insisting that there were no airliners at all, and that it was anything from holgrams to drones to made-over military aircraft to remotely-piloted airliners to light aircraft to cruise missile to death rays from space (select conspiracy of choice) wot dun it?

- Eric