Page 4 of 4

Re: Would you do it for a million quid?

Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 12:05 pm
by one eyed jack
Would you kill a man for a million then?

I wouldnt because I have a conscience. I would kill with extreme prejudice for nothing though if someone harmed anyone I loved in cold blood


Re: Would you do it for a million quid?

Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 1:23 pm
by Daz Savage
Not gay at all but would do gay porn for a lot less than a million.
Certainly doesn't mean I have any gay leanings though and I can't see why you make that leap at all?

Let's extrapolate for a moment shall we?
Are we saying then that everyone that flips burgers for a living loves to do it at home for free?
Do soldiers necessarily enjoy marching and killing in their spare time.

The old adage is that 'plumber's taps always drip' and it's quite true. The fact is that most people do stuff they hate for a living and do it for the cash. When they get home they become a different person entirely.
I know several pornstars personally who have been driven off sex by this biz.

So I'm sorry but your supposition just doesn't stand up.

I, however would still do gay porn for the right money.
I hope this helps to clear things up for the inept and confused.


Re: Would you do it for a million quid?

Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 2:37 pm
by one eyed jack
Jezz Louise. Dont take it personal Daz. Strewth geez.

So you'd do it for a lot less than a million. Ok then. not sure your compariosn between not liking ones job and tkaing it up the arse being things we dont necessarily like to do when earning a crust is something most people can live with and do.

I'm just saying....Well Ive said it already anyway


Re: Would you do it for a million quid?

Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 2:39 pm
by one eyed jack
Sorry for the spelling mistakes again Frank !happy! I really should check my grammer before posting


Re: Would you do it for a million quid?

Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 4:11 pm
by Daz Savage
Not even sure what you're on about now.
The absence of natural flow and grammatical structure to the sentences is making things a bit difficult to follow.
But there's no point in complaining that I took something seriously when you asked a question and made your position clear.

I'm no longer surprised anymore when people post bullshit claims here with an invitation to comment and then moan when they get an answer that has some thought behind it.

You asked... I answered... don't cry about it.


Re: Would you do it for a million quid?

Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 4:22 pm
by Daz Savage
!previous! "My point is if you could do it for a million then you can easily do it for a grand" !previous!
But your point is so obviously wrong.
You do what you do for the rate you do it right?
Well now, by your standards, I should expect you to lower the signup cost to all your sites then.
If you'll do what you do for ?30 a signup then you'll do it for a quid surely?
I mean that's the point you're making - that a person who does something for money must like it and therefore would do it for much less.

Of course you won't lower your prices... again, the point is wrong.

I suspect you have been reading the Groucho Marx quote where he asks a woman to sleep with him for a million bucks.
When she agrees he asks her to do it for 20 bucks.
She is offended and asks what kind of woman he takes her for.
He replies. "We've established what kind of woman you are, we are now haggling the price."
It's a funny quote and I have used it myself for humorous effect but it doesn't translate well into your argument here.


Re: Would you do it for a million quid?

Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 4:23 pm
by Daz Savage
lol