Re: Whitest place in the UK........?
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 8:59 am
Reggie Perrin wrote:
> It's like renta-bigot on the Yahoo Royal Family Forum right
> now. Maybe it's healthy that people can get their racism and
> sense of injustice off their chests on a forum like that. It's
> depressing that so many people think that 'Paki' is a
> completely accaptable term, just a shortened version of
> Pakistani.
Well, that's what it is.
It is used in an offensive way as well, but that's because there are negative attitudes towards people of Pakistani origins.
The only reason 'Pakistani' is not deemed offensive itself is that people prefer their insults to be short and crisp. Thus, people with that negative attitude would have used the official term for offensive purposes had it been shorter - and I am pretty sure many people in the educated classes simply use the long version 'Pakistani', and do mean it offensively.
I simply do not like giving up the short form to people who use the term offensively. It's like surrendering a bit of the language.
> It's like renta-bigot on the Yahoo Royal Family Forum right
> now. Maybe it's healthy that people can get their racism and
> sense of injustice off their chests on a forum like that. It's
> depressing that so many people think that 'Paki' is a
> completely accaptable term, just a shortened version of
> Pakistani.
Well, that's what it is.
It is used in an offensive way as well, but that's because there are negative attitudes towards people of Pakistani origins.
The only reason 'Pakistani' is not deemed offensive itself is that people prefer their insults to be short and crisp. Thus, people with that negative attitude would have used the official term for offensive purposes had it been shorter - and I am pretty sure many people in the educated classes simply use the long version 'Pakistani', and do mean it offensively.
I simply do not like giving up the short form to people who use the term offensively. It's like surrendering a bit of the language.