egafd.com

Regretfully, Sam, much of this post of yours is trolling. Stirring up stuff for the sake of stirring it up.

Alice In Blunderland wrote:


> I do find your comment below about the freedom to dish out
> sarcastic & untrue comments pretty amusing, considering that
> Huffers decides who will be able to join & those who would be
> turned down flat such as Colonel & myself are then attacked
> endlessly by all the usual suspects, without any right to reply
> on the board.
>

As a 'victim' of the huffers myself I have to agree with you Alice.

Sam frequently rants on about his beloved and I think a lot of 'his' comments are being made by or on behalf of the nameless one.

Double standards always springs to mind !laugh!

I'm sorry? Was it not you who called me Wazza's attack dog, less than an hour ago?

The trouble with you, colonel, is that you like to dish it out but can't take it back.

Oh, not that 'Wazza's on Sam's PC' crap again is it?

How original.

another storm in a teacup

seems to be the norm for the o/t forum thesedays...sighs

Andy Taylor wrote:

I have to agree that the Rape and Paedophilia posts are not appropriate for this forum.

Admins - you are quick to remove other posts for infringing the FAQs, isn't it time these were updated to cover this kind of thing as well?


I totally agree Andy. Those two topics always seem to come up when the topic of porn comes up and it has no place within it at all.

In fact it really annoys me when the subject comes up with porn and always puts a dampener on proceedings.

Seeing the posts Mike make aren't illegal, what's the problem with them? They may be controvertial or inflamatory, but others have the choice not to respond. Whether you believe in his views or not, they are his views - and nothing is going to change them..

Jonny I agree with you on that point but why then would bgafd mods admit to censoring and removing other posters replies within 'those' actual threads and not actually remove the whole thread itself!?

I think its disgusting that other people who do take the time to reply to mike, have their valid points taken off of the discussion, so much so that the thread now does not read correctly and the points brought up by other posters cannot be aired.

That is fucking biased in my eyes, whether you agree or disagree with mike's views you should be able to respond or challenge those views otherwise what is the point in posting on this forum?

Keni

The last 24 hours have seen Sam become more offensive than WZR, who I am prepared to believe at face value and am quite happy to talk to- we may not have a detente- but we have a licence to talk about a detente.

Note to Sam. Drop it please.

Please point out where I've been offensive in the past 24 hours, colonel, as I'm sick of your lies.

1) You accused the huffers of tolerating homophobia, which was a complete lie.

2) You insinuate that a man who links to sites where they talked about 'love' for children, and wants to trivialise rape, would fit in better at the huffers, which is not only is insulting and offensive to me, but other people on that forum you have no quarrels with.

3)You've accused me of being someone's 'attack dog' -or words to that affect- on many occasions over the past 2-3 weeks, which is insulting my intelligence, as if I have no opinions of my own??therefore it is also offensive to me.

Now, colonel, after insulting my intelligence, insinuating I and my friends would be mates with a man of Mike Freeman's nature, and accusing me, directly, of tolerating homophobia, I have not had a single apology.

This spreading of lies and constant badgering of another forumite shouldn't be allowed to continue, under the FAQs, but I won't complain as long as I have the right to defend not only myself, but also the truth in general.

Again, if I've been offensive over the past 24 hours, point it out. I can only think the accusing you of being a troll as offensive, but unlike your homophobe/rape toleration remarks directed at huffers -and thus: me- my accusing you of being a forum troll at least have a basis of reason due to your constant lies, insinuations and sarcasm. Even the mods realised your trollish behaviour when you posted your gloating thread after Wazza was ejected yet again, the Saturday before last, as they deleted it knowing it was only posted to stir up trouble.

And to top it off you now demand I 'drop it.' I've been telling you to 'put up or shut up' for nearly 2 weeks now, which amounts to the same thing really; and only yesterday I told you to 'give it a fucking rest'; NOW you want ME to drop it???ok, I will, for the sake of peace on the forum.

Please apologise for your lies and insinuations and we'll say no more of it.