Page 4 of 10
Re: Glasgow Airport incident
Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 8:49 am
by Vara
Closing the stable door after the horse has bolted, I'm afraid. We could, however, correct the deportation laws so anyone of non-British heritage who speaks hatred towards the country and its people can be deported by force on a permanent basis, whether they were born here or not.
Re: Glasgow Airport incident
Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 8:54 am
by Jacques
They are a shite news channel
Re: Glasgow Airport incident
Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 8:56 am
by Jacques
Re: Glasgow Airport incident
Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 8:56 am
by Vara
Anyone of foreign heritage who speaks hatred towards this country or its people should be deported to the country where their parents or grandparents came from. Same with anyone who takes up a religion like Islam. If they like the religion enough to want to turn to speak hatred towards us or go one step further and start to murder us in our high streets, then they should be deported to the nearest Islamic country, whether they be native Brits or not.
Re: Glasgow Airport incident
Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 9:29 am
by steve56
thats a good idea but i cant see LABOUR doing it.
Re: Glasgow Airport incident
Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 10:26 am
by Pervert
As has been pointed out, some of those who take part in these terror attacks are white Britons brought up as Christians who have embraced the extreme form of Islam being presented to them.
The appeal to these arseholes, I'm almost certain, is very basic: hatred of women. They live in a world where women work, they dress seductively, they get drunk, smoke, take drugs, sleep around, and enjoy the freedoms the rest of us do. Such behaviour emasculates the knuckle-trailing types who believe women should be kept in their place----chained to the home, doing nothing that reflects on their lords and masters.
Just an opinion----but it's a good way to get the moronic little soldiers to do the bidding of their bosses, the ones who have their own agenda.
Re: Glasgow Airport incident
Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 10:58 am
by Vara
No, but most other countries would, not least the Americans. In fact, if the same things happened in the US that happen here then the Muslims in question would find themselves on a quick CIA flight to
Guantanamo in chains and red boiler suits. But seeing that we have a
very strong and loud minority of reverse racists (read
George Galloway) in this country we, the majority who'd send them packing, are told that we must "understand them" or else we're branded as "racists".
I've been doing a bit of reading about our Islamic "friends", and what I found was just a tad worrying. Nah, actually it was
very worrying.
"
Jihad means "to strive or struggle," and is considered the "sixth pillar of Islam" by a minority of Muslim authorities. Within Islamic jurisprudence, jihad is usually taken to mean military exertion against non-Muslim combatants in the defense or expansion of the Islamic state, the ultimate purpose of which is to establish the universal domination of Islam. Jihad, the only form of warfare permissible in Islamic law, may be declared against non-Muslims who refuse to convert to Islam or submit to Islamic rule. Jihad is perpetual in nature; in theory, there can be no permanent peace with non-Muslim states, only truces which can be repudiated when circumstances become favorable for the resumption of hostilities. It ceases when Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians submit to the authority of Islam and agree to pay the jizya (a poll tax) and kharaj (a land tax), and when polytheists convert to Islam. Those who do not accept these terms may be enslaved or killed. For most Twelvers Shias, jihad can only be waged in the presence of a divinely appointed leader of the Muslim community, and as such is suspended in their absence.
Under most circumstances and for most Muslims, jihad is a collective duty (fard kifaya): its performance by some individuals exempts the others. Only for those vested with authority, especially the sovereign (imam), does jihad become an individual duty. For the rest of the populace, this happens only in the case of a general mobilization. Some Muslim authorities, especially among the Shi'a and Sufis, distinguish between the "greater jihad", which pertains to spiritual self-perfection, and the "lesser jihad", defined as warfare. Jihad may also refer to one's striving to attain religious and moral perfection."
Makes you realise exactly why Muslims came to the West that they hate in the first place, doesn't it!
Re: Glasgow Airport incident
Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 11:03 am
by Vara
Arab, Pakistani, white or whatever, anyone who resorts to hate and violence in my country should be either jailed or, in the case of these Muslims, deported to a country that's populated by people who they do like (i.e. an Islamic country).
Re: Glasgow Airport incident
Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 12:08 pm
by randyandy
I haven't seen much news has Chandra Chipilati or whatever her names is come out and condemned these latest attacks ?
Has the Council of Mosques said owt to condemn the attacks?
They are usually 1st on the scene when one of their kind is arrested but always appear to vanish into the distance when they realise 'Oh shit it was Muslims'
Re: Glasgow Airport incident
Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 1:56 pm
by vp002
Vara,
For the record where is your research on all this based on ?
And have any muslims actually said this to you ?
This sort of talk is how dictatorships start.....
And how ironic we can criticise them for their treatment of women whilst on a porn forum ?