Re: Goodbye England
Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2006 4:46 pm
Administrator BGAFD,
Thanks for the link. It was very informative and reflects the sexual mores of the international political community. The basis of most of the international legislation reflects the religious background of the legislators.
Censors feel morally superior to porno film-makers and to the people who watch them.
Authoritarian governments always have the most Draconian censorship of sexual imagery. Religious or secular they try to control the sexual behaviour of the people because they think that a hedonistic society would be uncontrollable and anarchy would prevail. Rulers and politicians speculate how would they all get up and go out to work or to worship, sell or produce goods for the people to consume.
All the politicians of the West want is a nation of passive consumers and in the East a nation of passive worshippers. Everyone under control. Control of sexuality is control per se. The control of women is obvious from the condemnation of single mothers here in England to the enshrowded and clitorodectimised imprisonment of muslim fundamentalists females by their lord and masters the men.
Politicians and priests universally realise that pornography the propaganda of hedonism leads to the real atavistic sexual nature of women being revealed. The asexual or romantic image is torn down. Pornography is educative,iconoclastic and alters society more than anything else because women become overtly sexual without feeling shame.
Watching pornography is not just a lone masturbatory practice of the male. Both sexes are watching it often together.
Even though the penalty is death in some societies!
Think about it. Pornography is political.
Mike.
Thanks for the link. It was very informative and reflects the sexual mores of the international political community. The basis of most of the international legislation reflects the religious background of the legislators.
Censors feel morally superior to porno film-makers and to the people who watch them.
Authoritarian governments always have the most Draconian censorship of sexual imagery. Religious or secular they try to control the sexual behaviour of the people because they think that a hedonistic society would be uncontrollable and anarchy would prevail. Rulers and politicians speculate how would they all get up and go out to work or to worship, sell or produce goods for the people to consume.
All the politicians of the West want is a nation of passive consumers and in the East a nation of passive worshippers. Everyone under control. Control of sexuality is control per se. The control of women is obvious from the condemnation of single mothers here in England to the enshrowded and clitorodectimised imprisonment of muslim fundamentalists females by their lord and masters the men.
Politicians and priests universally realise that pornography the propaganda of hedonism leads to the real atavistic sexual nature of women being revealed. The asexual or romantic image is torn down. Pornography is educative,iconoclastic and alters society more than anything else because women become overtly sexual without feeling shame.
Watching pornography is not just a lone masturbatory practice of the male. Both sexes are watching it often together.
Even though the penalty is death in some societies!
Think about it. Pornography is political.
Mike.