Page 4 of 4
Re: Jehovah's witnesses
Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2003 12:18 pm
by Deano!
The subject of JW's and porn reminds me of the time two spunky chicks knocked on my door and handed me a package they said was laying on my door step. There were Jehovas Witnesses but so cute and sexy I thought could hardly believe it. They tried talking me into buying a Watchtower mag. I politly said I couldn't talk to them and slowly closed the door as they kept yakking ( as they must ). Anyway, I opened the package and found it was some filthy tapes I'd ordered a few days before. How funny it seemed to me that they were accidently finally delivered by a couple of ravers who looked like porn stars themselves, yet followed a religeon that insisted they keep their long legs together except for churning out babies. Its a wierd world.
Re: Jehovah's witnesses
Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2003 12:23 pm
by steve56
i bet they would have shit thereselves if they saw the vids,lol.
Re: Jehovah's witnesses
Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2003 8:09 pm
by crofter
going by some of the replys, I am not sure who is the strangest the bible bashers or the porn purveyors of the forum.
Re: Jehovah's witnesses
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2003 6:09 am
by videokim
Hi Arnold
6 years ago i was a Jehovah's witness before embarking on a porn career, so behind the chatter & smiles there's some naughty girls out there.
love Kim xxx
Re: Jehovah's witnesses
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2003 6:33 am
by steve56
hi kim,so you gonna knock on my door tonight,LOL.
Re: One more (on the) Watchtower
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2003 6:49 am
by Bronson Lee
Well said Giles .......
'What really annoys me is the way in which Christians will justify themselves in a discussion by saying 'The Bible says....' as though a book written by men a long time ago in a different society and context could be used that way. The assertion of your belief as 'The Truth' over all others is just terrible combined with the apocalyptic view that 'Things' are getting 'worse'.'
apart from the Coptic Bible .....90 percent of Bibles have been rewriten
from the Council of Nicea Bible.
Prior to the year 321, there were many different gospels and many different thoughts about Jesus. In 321 King Constantine called the first Council of Nicea to figure out what would go in the Bible. Constantine was not a Christian, but knew that he needed to have the support of the Christians in order to solidify the Roman Empire. One of the most popular gospels in the first 300 years A.D. was the Gospel of Thomas, a gospel that "did not make the cut."
Constantine needed a view, a concept of Jesus that would empower himself. In 381, fifty years of debating ended and the Bible was officially canonized. There were two powerful forces and ideas discussed in those fifty years. One view, the view of Arius, was that Jesus was a man who, through great effort and spiritual practice, became God-like, in fact became God - or the Son of God. In this view, Jesus was seen as a model, a teacher, someone to emulate. It was the view of Arius that each of us has the right and privilege to a one-to-one relationship with Jesus and that we too can become more God-like by practicing what he taught and how he lived.
The opposing and winning point of view was that Jesus was a God, far removed from the normal, mortal man, that he was an immense symbol of power and authority. The advantage of this point of view for the early church was that one had to go to a higher authority in order to have contact with Jesus; one needed Popes and Priests. This idea suited Constantine well for it was in line with his ideas of power, authority and submission to the State.
Shortly before he died, Constantine asked to be Baptized and became a Christian just before he died.
The work of a POWERMONGER not a GOD !
so relative but not in the way Christians bash it out !
life for ruth
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2003 6:55 am
by steve56
if this film ever comes on tv again ,give it a look it stars patrick mcgoohan/micheal craig ive only seen it once but for the early 60s it was very good,apparently jehovas dont agree with blood transfusions i dont want to spoil it for those that havent seen it.
Re: Jehovah's witnesses
Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2003 9:48 am
by philk
I am well fucked off, up here in the Midlands the only JWs we get is a bunch of fucking old grannies - made the mistake of being polite once and now everytime they are in the area they make a beeline for my door for a nice chat!
Jason