egafd.com

Oh and as to the diaper work - I'm not going to get into this again but as I have said in the past. I am happy doing fetish work. I am not happy showing stuff between my legs.
This has nothing to do with the controversy on both subjects... just everything to do with me not being comfortable with people seeing between my legs. This is why I never considering and would never consider those levels because it's personal to me and I something to be kept between me and my partner and not shared with the world.

Fetish work of any kind doesn't mean anything to me as long as it doesn't disrespect my open leg opinions or risk my safety (in terms of I wouldn't do suspension for example because my figure and my limbs being so fragile this would seriously hurt me and possibly bruise me/mark me for future shoots)

So I am not going to get into the arguement of what fetish sites I have worked for because that is not what is in question. What is in question is the future of my career after realising (I would say someone but now I know it is more than one) photographers have taken those images of me in the past and betrayed my trust to not use anything accidents when I've been posing around because to me when working getting the right pose means a lot to me so I sometimes lose myself in the moment. But I felt I could trust people to know my levels and not betray my trust - clearly not!

Shot number 6. You have shot for this guy repeatedly - surely you would know whether or not there was 'too much' on show. That shot was posed to that standard. You would have seen his work? It is a free gallery he runs.

As to the fetish shots (chained ones) - you've done a lot of these - surely you check your work out?

Some of those images I would also presume have been copied off various profiles. Thus you would have been aware.

AND YOU ARE A HYPOCRITE. This I have just copied off your purestorm profile. Surely this would constitute as being too much? I can make bits out.

http://www.imagebam.com/image/93bb92258158131


Then there is more, upon digging around a certain forum:

Is this the fingering the arsehole shot you mentioned? Or was this one planned?

http://www.imagebam.com/image/4658de258159249

http://www.imagebam.com/image/3f40a1258159236 (this one note the top central picture)


If these images have existed around the net for the last 12-24 months then isn't it just a storm in a teacup??? Wow you shot these pictures. Yawn. Oh dear an open leg shot broke free and ran into the vast wilds of the internet. You should have expected something like this to have happened if you shoot nudes or erotic nudes. I am sorry if you are upset. But I have to say this: you are naive.

You have some super-duper vision if you can make out bits on this image: http://www.imagebam.com/image/93bb92258158131

All I see is darkness.

C'mon, admin, delete or close this thread like you did for the 'Danielle Maye is a racist' thread. That one could have been left open since she and her partner clearly have issues with race judging from what I heard were further constant 'opinions' on the topic after professing innocence.

Do Rachelle a favour and let her be. Nothing more needs to be added to this.

stuarts12 wrote:

>
> AND YOU ARE A HYPOCRITE.
> Then there is more, upon digging around a certain forum:
>
> Is this the fingering the arsehole shot you mentioned? Or was
> this one planned?
>
> http://www.imagebam.com/image/4658de258159249
>
> http://www.imagebam.com/image/3f40a1258159236 (this one note
> the top central picture)
>


No stuarts12, the arsehole fingering in question occurred in the six images posted by krisman on 06-01-13 10:03.

These images you add do shed some extra light on the "accidents".

Oopsy, I appear to have caused a bit of a shitstorm!

It's a pity the shots were not intentional as I personally still think they are quite artistic and extremely erotic. They don't look like some random porn site skanks just firing their legs open.

Yes the pictures are revealing beyond the levels the model said she would go to, but they still seem in good taste (to look at anyway).

Like I said, I'd far rather these images were consensually revealing. However, compared to some subsequent images I really fail to see a lot of difference.


Oh well...

krisman wrote:

compared to some subsequent images I really
> fail to see a lot of difference.
>
>
> Oh well...


^^ this

There sure is some pathetic people out there. It shouldn't matter a jot, what levels a model has performed to for other togs in the past, if she tells you what she is happy with, deceiving her is the act of a maggot.

Trust and respect are clearly hard concepts for some people to work out!

I have to admit, Rachelle has probably cheesed me off and caused me more offence than any other model in the business, but seeing her treated like this pisses me off even more, it just highlights everything that is bad about this business.

If admin had any humanity they would delete this thread.

She is a young woman...what 21/22? she may have been 19 when some of these images were taken. Some of you weren't naive or made mistakes when you were that age, or changed your mind about things? The difference is our mistakes aren't dragged up and put all over the internet.

I think she'll have enough sense to keep her legs closed in future and not trust people to be "gentlemen", but its quite a hard way to learn a lesson.

People who profess to be "Gentlemen" in this business usually have an agenda...and probably the last people I would trust...

stuarts12 wrote:

> Shot number 6. You have shot for this guy repeatedly - surely
> you would know whether or not there was 'too much' on show.
> That shot was posed to that standard. You would have seen his
> work? It is a free gallery he runs.
>
> As to the fetish shots (chained ones) - you've done a lot of
> these - surely you check your work out?
>
> Some of those images I would also presume have been copied off
> various profiles. Thus you would have been aware.
>
> AND YOU ARE A HYPOCRITE. This I have just copied off your
> purestorm profile. Surely this would constitute as being too
> much? I can make bits out.
>
> http://www.imagebam.com/image/93bb92258158131
>
>
> Then there is more, upon digging around a certain forum:
>
> Is this the fingering the arsehole shot you mentioned? Or was
> this one planned?
>
> http://www.imagebam.com/image/4658de258159249
>
> http://www.imagebam.com/image/3f40a1258159236 (this one note
> the top central picture)
>
>
> If these images have existed around the net for the last 12-24
> months then isn't it just a storm in a teacup??? Wow you shot
> these pictures. Yawn. Oh dear an open leg shot broke free and
> ran into the vast wilds of the internet. You should have
> expected something like this to have happened if you shoot
> nudes or erotic nudes. I am sorry if you are upset. But I have
> to say this: you are naive.

First image that is on my profile - There is nothing showing in that so no idea what you are talking about. I wouldn't have it on my profile it there was. My hip is pushed out and as such my bum is covering me.
Second shot - there is jack all showing in that either! Because I've put a hand of something in the way on every shot... I NEVER said I didn't do erotic nudes.
Third shot - yes the middle one you mention I wasn't happy with and when I saw it I asked Ant about it and he removed it immediately and changed it to the one above it.

Yes I am aware I've made a huge mistake trusting people and I will agree that I have been naive (Clearly as I had no idea all the first links you posted even existed because I don't check out my work unless it gets sent to me simply because it would be impossible to keep track of all the work I've done - so I have to trust people to respect my levels and clearly they haven't been) HENCE my saying this whole thing coming out has totally screwed me on a professional level because of trust now and the fact I can't be as naive.

But I am no hypocrite! I will agree with naive but I haven't got any shots out of my comfort zone on my profile

This now needs to be put to bed and deleted - it has caused a model distress and thats not fair!