Page 4 of 8

Re: Kirsty Rollings (Klouise1992)

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 3:30 am
by victorthem
I know the girl that owns the profile is, and is not her. But there are some pictures in her private gallery that kirstie is in. Looks like a petty ameture girl girl shoot but its definitely her licking pussy and getting fuckd with a dildo

Re: Kirsty Rollings (Klouise1992)

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 9:49 am
by victorthem
Anyone else had a look to confirm??

Re: Kirsty Rollings (Klouise1992)

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 3:13 pm
by davy99
There are not even any pics of her with another girl!
Unless you mean in her private gallery, in which case you are clearly some scamming spammer who is involved with that adultwork account, trying to get people to pay to view the pics and they will then find that Kirsty is OBVIOUSLY not going to be in any of the images!
Nice try, junior. But nobody is going to fall for that trick Lmao!

Re: Kirsty Rollings (Klouise1992)

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 4:22 pm
by shelle7
there is no evidence whatsoever those pics are Kirsty as "would you believe it" her face is blocked out...nice move.

give us a hint at a holy grail of adult glam in the uk and pull the rug out from under...

i'll say its not her in any way shape or form until there are clearer pics.

Re: Kirsty Rollings (Klouise1992)

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 6:06 pm
by dynamatiques
shelle7 wrote:

> there is no evidence whatsoever those pics are Kirsty as "would
> you believe it" her face is blocked out...nice move.
>
> give us a hint at a holy grail of adult glam in the uk and pull
> the rug out from under...
>
> i'll say its not her in any way shape or form until there are
> clearer pics.


+1

There are no distinguishing marks such as moles/scars/tattoos etc. to discern the other girl's identity.

Do NOT waste your money like I did.

Re: Kirsty Rollings (Klouise1992)

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 6:15 pm
by davy99
Luckily I didn't even bother paying to look at the private gallery.

this idiot "victorthem" needs to be banned from here as he/she is clearly something to do with that adultwork profile and is trying to scam people on here to pay to see something that isn't even there.

Re: Kirsty Rollings (Klouise1992)

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 8:33 pm
by victorthem
Well I think you'll find the fingernails are a big giveaway in this picture....

https://fbcdn-photos-d-a.akamaihd.net/h ... .jpg?lvh=1

Come on boys, sharpen up.

Re: Kirsty Rollings (Klouise1992)

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 8:42 pm
by davy99
You really are an idiot.
People who have seen the private gallery have already said it IS NOT HER!
An fingernails????? I mean, REALLY?????? Just because she has used a certain colour of nail varnish or fake nails means that no other girl in the world ever will use the same.
You are a SCAMMER.
This has been the only thread you have EVER posted in... trying to fool people into paying to see a private gallery of some random not very good looking girl!

Re: Kirsty Rollings (Klouise1992)

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 8:46 pm
by victorthem
Jeez you are one stupid mother fucker!

Take your head out of your arse and have a look. That's not just a colour its a design ie. don't get two of the same you mongrel.

And why the fuck would I be scamming people for 2.50 you creatin

Re: Kirsty Rollings (Klouise1992)

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 9:35 pm
by davy99
Er... Yes you do. I'm a guy and even I know you can buy stick on false nails that have designs on them. And they are hugely mass produced.

Hey. My mate is a mechanic. He often appears to have oil in his nails. I saw some guy with oil in his nails the other day.... he must be that exact mate of mine, even though he wasn't.

End of the day...... have you forgot to read the other comments, dumb-ass... people who have seen the pictures have already said IT IS NOT HER.
So there you go... it isn't her. Stop going on about something that you know you are wrong about.

If I go and buy some false nails with the same design and wear them, does that mean I am then Kirsty and not myself any more?

Now give it up, you're boring now!