Page 4 of 9
					
				Re: melissa walker
				Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 1:38 pm
				by jj
				Oh, per-lease.....
A FIRST?
REALLY ???????????????????????????
			 
			
					
				Re: melissa walker
				Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 1:39 pm
				by jj
				She's what? 30+ now?
			 
			
					
				Re: melissa walker
				Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 1:40 pm
				by jj
				2 years is now the standard sentence for UNCORROBORATED AM.
She was a victim.
Why do you wish to add to her suffering?
			 
			
					
				Re: melissa walker
				Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 1:41 pm
				by jj
				I assume yer taking the piss.
			 
			
					
				Re: melissa walker
				Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 1:47 pm
				by jj
				Kyle Richmond wrote:
>  This has all been covered before on these forums, 
I missed that due to 'absence' but the parole farce has been 
discussed here very recently- although to be honest the crime was 
never in doubt; merely the underlying motivation. IMO her defence 
seem to have let her down very badly.
Is it any wonder that frightened women seem so unwiling to go to 
the police?
			 
			
					
				Re: melissa walker
				Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 1:48 pm
				by jj
				Indeed. 
But the 'collateral damage', meanwhile, is horrendous.
			 
			
					
				Re: melissa walker
				Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 7:19 pm
				by countb
				Let it go swampy,you are starting to fuck me off.
Its all a matter of opinions
			 
			
					
				Re: melissa walker
				Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 10:02 pm
				by jj
				It's evident that women in abusive relationships, for a variety of 
reasons, are often unwilling, or unable, to just get the Hell out.
I fail to see how someone victimised by a bigger and physically 
stronger partner can be described as anything else than a victim.
Too often, thanks to inadequate social support, these relationships 
end in tragedy for one or both.
			 
			
					
				Re: melissa walker
				Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 10:03 pm
				by jj
				No; in his case it seems to be a matter of prejudice and 
ignorance : -)