egafd.com

Besides, why would I be bitter? I dont have problems with my websites and I'm ticking along ok.

I don't pretend to know much about Bluebird other than the site has very poor navigation and they come across to me to be extremely arrogant.
Perhaps someone could answer some questions?
From what I can gather they are the new kids on the block with piles of cash? Where did all this money come from? Is it a joint venture with people like Ben Dover putting in cash? Or is it backed by this Charlie Chaplin guy? Sorry if the name is wrong?
Is he a multi millionaire?
Why does he want to put so much money into porn?
Will they be able to put others out of business and corner the market?
It was mentioned that contract girls are earning ?50k, with a Porsche and an apartment thrown in for good measure?
Do they have to make a certain amount of films per year for that? If so that seems extraordinary to me??? Apart from that Cindy Behr the rest are your average babe.
I would have spent the money differently. There must be several girls yet to do BG that could be persuaded with those big bucks? Just off my head, offer ?10k to Lucy Zara, Frankie Babe, Petra Morgan for a one off! Oh and bung Vicky Hollaway ?20k too! Surely even Danni Harward might be persuaded to show us her snatch for that sort of cash.
Now those girls really would make bluebird special and bring the punters in. I'm seriously willing to pay ?100 for one of those downloads.
Maybe more !wink!

Now those girls really would make bluebird special and bring the punters in. I'm seriously willing to pay ?100 for one of those downloads.

ha ha haaa...Fair play man. see where you are coming from. But one bloke paying ?100 for it the other mo fos will be getting it for free from rapidshare.

andy ide wrote:

> Good grief. TVX? Good value for money?!? Nice to hear, Megaton.

Lol! all good quality brit girls you like too see.

[quote]Why does he want to put so much money into porn?[/quote]

It gives him a feeling of importance? Sexual gratification? The 'Hugh Hefner' effect? Making even more money back, obviously (though not through porn).

[quote]Will they be able to put others out of business and corner the market?[/quote]

Yes; in the UK anyway. I mean, if I had the money, I'd get some decent performers on board, persuade the nations directors to work for me and inform them to only book girls that are willing to attend sex parties that I organise, and that will provide me with sexual favours 'on tap'. I mean, once I have 75% of the UK industry under my employment, where else are girls going to get enough work to live? I'd do this because I've no morals though. It's a good job I don't have the doh isn't it?!

[quote]It was mentioned that contract girls are earning ?50k, with a Porsche and an apartment thrown in for good measure?[/quote]

Well, what I'd do would be to put a clause in the performers contract where they'd have to exaggerate how much they get paid and what the perks of the job are. Hell, I might even really put them up in an apartment, and give them a car if things go well; and if things don't go so well, I don't have to do it, yet the performers still have to say I am providing these things because it's in the contract! It makes me look good and encourages new girls to come sign for me, which means more sex for me....yay! That's what I'd do anyway, because I'm immoral.

[quote]Just off my head, offer ?10k to Lucy Zara, Frankie Babe, Petra Morgan for a one off![/quote]

Hmmmm, maybe, but luckily for mankind, not everyone can be bought. It's very rare these days, but very refreshing.

Remember, I'm an immoral megalomaniac. Anything I've mentioned in this post is just my from own imagination and secret desires. I'm a very bad man.

Nw12 Michael jackson is rumoured to be a kiddie fiddler but I still cant help liking his music. i could easily hang out with Elton John for a beer. In other words what has all that got to do with his site problems? We should really stick to the issue at hand and not have to go into a character assassination as we seriously will be getting into personal territory.

That is not cool. So he aint no angel. Who is? Thats a liitle bit too low really isnt it? Come on. Its not really necessary.

[quote]Its not really necessary.[/quote]

It is to the naive girls who are about to sign a contract with him!

Thought of that?

A bit late for that then if they've signed on the dotted line anyway.