Page 4 of 4
Re: charmaine sinclaire
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 8:16 pm
by Lightningboy
Spot on with you there..those 4 (plus malene espensen) are the stand out models of today but we're never gonna see them in whitehouse etc like we used to see the 80's/90's models..it's far more interesting (and arousing) when you see a page 3 girl 'turn' to porn than a girl who goes straight into porn..don't you agree?
Re: charmaine sinclaire
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 11:24 am
by Lightningboy
..I think a lot of the girls have totally un-realistic ideas when it comes to getting work outside of glamour..they all say they want to get into tv/presenting/films etc but when it comes down to it they simply aren't cut out for mainstream tv and should stick to what they do best..ie Gemma Atkinson-beautiful girl, but as we could see on i'm a celeb,not much of a personality..even Lucy Pinder's not exactly the life and soul of the party when i've seen her on tv..i expect that's the last we've seen of michelle marsh too now that she's had a kid....there does seem to be a lot of call for LDM+kirsten imrie whenever they're mentioned on here,that's why there should be a site/mag dedicated to them and their contemparies...happy new year!
Re: charmaine sinclaire
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 4:07 pm
by Diamond1
Pinder is getting a six figure salary for just doing the television X presenting alone.