Re: A list of girls that do Boy-Girl and are NOT...
Posted: Sat May 06, 2006 3:36 am
Willie D wrote:
> "Not to slap anyone with the Los Angeles glove... but in the
> SanFranando valley alone it is estimated that between 50-100
> videos are made each day. No one would manufacture that many
> screw films if there wasn't a demand for the much product."
>
> Usually when some prefaces a statement with the, 'Not
> to...with..." line, that's exactly what you intend to do, and
> you're no different. BTW...it's "Fernando."
>
> Porn people are extremely prone to hyperbole when the talk
> skirts the "facts & figures." Usually it's money, but this one
> runs out every now and then.
>
> 1. 50-100 films made every year in SFV would be 50 * 52 =2600,
> or 100 * 52 = 5200. That's a big gap so go near the middle and
> say 3,500. Since the average studio put out an average of
> 25-30 films a year, you'd need to have upwards of 150 producers
> working around the clock, year round to make that quota.
> Example: 2005 Red Light District put out around 25 vids,
> Elegant Angel did around 30, these being two of the more
> productive gonzo stables in Porn Valley. Studios with contract
> whores put out even less (Vivid, Wicked, etc).
>
> 2. That would be a tremendous burden on the physical
> infrastructure of SFV, are there enough rented homes and
> abandoned warehouses in Northridge to shoot all that smut? 100
> vids a day means at least 300 or more whores, some having to do
> two scenes a day, not to mention at least 200 or so stunt cock,
> 100 makeup artists...agents running around putting out fires,
> pesky porn bloggers, the trade rag. I'm just not tasting your
> Kool-Aid here, babe.
>
> 3. Agreed, this doesn't take into account the little
> "boutique" studios like Astrux or NinnWorx which make only a
> few high-quality flesh vids, but it also ignores the many
> studios which have gone broke (JKP, Vertigo/American Hardcore,
> Extreme 1.0, Rain, Rob Spallone's biz, etc, etc).
>
> Here's
> an example of the same hyperbole heaped on Jenna Jameson
>
> I seems like you want to refer to your "Los Angeles days" as if
> you set Porn Valley on fire. Umm...your stint lasted 75 or so
> films, take out the ≈15 that were non-sex or g/g, see
> where I'm going?
>
> Just relax...it's only smut.
>
>
This is where the teeth come out. Still I'll try and be nice.
You're getting your film numbers from I.A.F.D which is pretty much just another board run by some horny porn fans. And it's always in error when it comes to me.
It does not include Internet work, magazine or my former stage names. (I've had 6 of them) Additionally it does it include my european work or the work I did in Hong Kong.
As for my stint in L.A.
Hyperbole my arse. I base those number on one thing... The numbers in my books. I run a succesful chop shop and business with the americans have been increasing.
But for the record, I do business with americans but I haven't been in the states in 3 years and I don't plan on returning any time soon. My references to Los Angeles are more based on the fact of that's where I learned my trade and this is the year I intend to make the american market a much bigger priority.
I was hoping that the lovely english speaking British community would become my vehicle for this goal. But in the end, expansion doesn't have to be a priority in my business. Right now I have to because I've got more than enough on my dinner plate now.
I can just let my husband buy another boat and sail back to Sicily. And once I leave this country my money will suddenly increase and I'll just intensify what I do now.
Kelly
---
PS> Playing the "Spelling mistake cop" on a forum doesn't strengthen your arguments, it only makes you look weak. It becomes obvious to everyone, that you're grasping at any straw to apart somone's comments.
But for argument sake, yes it is "Fernando."
> "Not to slap anyone with the Los Angeles glove... but in the
> SanFranando valley alone it is estimated that between 50-100
> videos are made each day. No one would manufacture that many
> screw films if there wasn't a demand for the much product."
>
> Usually when some prefaces a statement with the, 'Not
> to...with..." line, that's exactly what you intend to do, and
> you're no different. BTW...it's "Fernando."
>
> Porn people are extremely prone to hyperbole when the talk
> skirts the "facts & figures." Usually it's money, but this one
> runs out every now and then.
>
> 1. 50-100 films made every year in SFV would be 50 * 52 =2600,
> or 100 * 52 = 5200. That's a big gap so go near the middle and
> say 3,500. Since the average studio put out an average of
> 25-30 films a year, you'd need to have upwards of 150 producers
> working around the clock, year round to make that quota.
> Example: 2005 Red Light District put out around 25 vids,
> Elegant Angel did around 30, these being two of the more
> productive gonzo stables in Porn Valley. Studios with contract
> whores put out even less (Vivid, Wicked, etc).
>
> 2. That would be a tremendous burden on the physical
> infrastructure of SFV, are there enough rented homes and
> abandoned warehouses in Northridge to shoot all that smut? 100
> vids a day means at least 300 or more whores, some having to do
> two scenes a day, not to mention at least 200 or so stunt cock,
> 100 makeup artists...agents running around putting out fires,
> pesky porn bloggers, the trade rag. I'm just not tasting your
> Kool-Aid here, babe.
>
> 3. Agreed, this doesn't take into account the little
> "boutique" studios like Astrux or NinnWorx which make only a
> few high-quality flesh vids, but it also ignores the many
> studios which have gone broke (JKP, Vertigo/American Hardcore,
> Extreme 1.0, Rain, Rob Spallone's biz, etc, etc).
>
> Here's
> an example of the same hyperbole heaped on Jenna Jameson
>
> I seems like you want to refer to your "Los Angeles days" as if
> you set Porn Valley on fire. Umm...your stint lasted 75 or so
> films, take out the ≈15 that were non-sex or g/g, see
> where I'm going?
>
> Just relax...it's only smut.
>
>
This is where the teeth come out. Still I'll try and be nice.
You're getting your film numbers from I.A.F.D which is pretty much just another board run by some horny porn fans. And it's always in error when it comes to me.
It does not include Internet work, magazine or my former stage names. (I've had 6 of them) Additionally it does it include my european work or the work I did in Hong Kong.
As for my stint in L.A.
Hyperbole my arse. I base those number on one thing... The numbers in my books. I run a succesful chop shop and business with the americans have been increasing.
But for the record, I do business with americans but I haven't been in the states in 3 years and I don't plan on returning any time soon. My references to Los Angeles are more based on the fact of that's where I learned my trade and this is the year I intend to make the american market a much bigger priority.
I was hoping that the lovely english speaking British community would become my vehicle for this goal. But in the end, expansion doesn't have to be a priority in my business. Right now I have to because I've got more than enough on my dinner plate now.
I can just let my husband buy another boat and sail back to Sicily. And once I leave this country my money will suddenly increase and I'll just intensify what I do now.
Kelly
---
PS> Playing the "Spelling mistake cop" on a forum doesn't strengthen your arguments, it only makes you look weak. It becomes obvious to everyone, that you're grasping at any straw to apart somone's comments.
But for argument sake, yes it is "Fernando."