Re: WITHOUT MY CONSENT
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 2:14 pm
Avalon.
I think you were correct in posting here, what they did was wrong , whether accidental or not. Models have suffered with this for long enough. I saw an advert in a "paper" once advertising that two VERY famous Page 3 Girls of the time were working as escorts for them. Of course they werent but it turned out after their solicitors got involved that they had named two escorts with the same names as the two models. The company was dealt with. Its also the same as top page 3 girls photographs being used on cards in adverts for escorts in phone boxes. That is still happening now and it stinks
Raven getting insulting emails also stinks, surely the person can be traced ?
NeilUK
I think you were correct in posting here, what they did was wrong , whether accidental or not. Models have suffered with this for long enough. I saw an advert in a "paper" once advertising that two VERY famous Page 3 Girls of the time were working as escorts for them. Of course they werent but it turned out after their solicitors got involved that they had named two escorts with the same names as the two models. The company was dealt with. Its also the same as top page 3 girls photographs being used on cards in adverts for escorts in phone boxes. That is still happening now and it stinks
Raven getting insulting emails also stinks, surely the person can be traced ?
NeilUK