Page 3 of 3

Re: GANGBANG QUESTION

Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 8:47 pm
by Harry Hardon
Few of these things got raided in London over the weekend


Re: GANGBANG QUESTION

Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 3:48 am
by Nob3y
Thats the way it should be. Non industry people need to have certs or do everything including oral covered


Re: GANGBANG QUESTION

Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 5:13 am
by erotical
If nobody involved in gb has certs, its down to them. Unprotected oral carries significantly less risk in general than full sex but girls should be aware that lower risk multiplied by large number of parners adds up to a high risk activity. Especially true in the paid gangbang situation where the blokes who pay obviouskly aren't the worlds most careful individuals.

Anyone who does certed work male or female should avoid or disclose unprotected work, oral included. Either that or avoid doing certed work for a couple of test cycles afterwards. Is there any official guidance for performers?

This common statement that certs are only true on the test day is misleading. Firstly anything recent might not be picked up so its not 100% on the day (though little in life is). Secondly if clear on the test day, chance of anything changing over three or four weeks is pretty low so long as sex is certed (with partners who also follow rules), not involving large numbers of people, africa visitors etc.

Re: GANGBANG QUESTION

Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 1:42 pm
by puretotty
Well from what I have learnt to date... there are a bunch of girls doing gangbangs with non industry guys... and the oral is definetly not with a condom... and the non industry guys are definetly not certed... so I guess that's not how it is NOB3Y...

There's a bunch of AW stuff done that way... but thanks for your input


Re: GANGBANG QUESTION

Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 7:42 pm
by puretotty
In truth even with certs it's a lottery, no ? A girl or guy can be certed then go and fuck half a dozen partners unprotected and no one would be any the wiser ???

I'm not saying this does go on... just saying that it is a hazard of the job.


Re: GANGBANG QUESTION

Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 10:44 pm
by sarahjane2
i was working at one in London last weekend and it got done by the police when i was there.. now the club i work at in east London been close down. xxx

Re: GANGBANG QUESTION

Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 5:49 am
by videokim
In truth even with certs it's a lottery, no ? A girl or guy can be certed then go and fuck half a dozen partners unprotected and no one would be any the wiser ???

I'm not saying this does go on... just saying that it is a hazard of the job.



True words! regular monthly tests are very important to stop std outbreaks but having a cert don't make you any safer in regards to having unprotected sex, a model will have sex once & think nothing but after several shoots in a month you do think to yourself even though these guys are all certed i hope none of them have any std's...a lottery & as you say hazard of the job.


Re: GANGBANG QUESTION

Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 7:36 pm
by Harry Hardon
Hope you and the girls are okay SJ. I think the organisers were silly doing a party so close to the olympic stadium. it was asking for trouble..


Re: GANGBANG QUESTION

Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 9:33 am
by JasonThickCock
Better off holding your shoot (no pun intended) at a venue. Tease 2 near Peterborough may cater for that kind of thing; it's a swingers club. If so, count me in!!