Page 3 of 3

Re: sex in public

Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2003 7:02 am
by todge
I'm clearly pissing in the wind here but........

I actually agree with the tightening of the legislation.

Porn should be freely available for adults to buy/watch if they so choose.
It shouldn't be on show to those who don't want to see it or might take
offence.

What about a mum with young kids coming across such a scene ?
Why should she be put in that position ?

Ok, there are public places and public places.
Ok, you can say there weren't people about and we had lookouts but
then you should have to prove it - which is easier said than done.

Re: sex in public

Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2003 7:03 am
by steve56
wasnt there a windmill in a vto yrs ago [hot summer nights]

Re: sex in public

Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2003 7:08 am
by jj
Couldn't she be cool enough just to tell them about Mummies and Daddies?
Anyway, if I took kids out to the country, I'd almost EXPECT to run across couples indulging in various acts of naughtiness......it must be all that fresh air.
I agree, I wouldn't necessarily want them to be at it like knives in the doorway of my local Waitrose, but that's mainly because their trolleys are so wide.......

Re: sex in public

Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2003 7:08 am
by jj
'vto'?

Re: sex in public

Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2003 7:10 am
by steve56
single mums i find sexy in a way?

Re: sex in public

Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2003 7:16 am
by jj
What, you mean, like they're women?

Re: sex in public

Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2003 7:53 am
by Hornetbloke
"Video Teresa Orlowski" if I remember correctly

Re: sex in public

Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2003 7:58 am
by jj
Of course: why didn't I think of that? Obvious, really.
Still, I suppose it's just desserts for 'miscegenation'......