egafd.com

[IMG]http://s2d4.turboimagehost.com/t1/6266716_pcworld2.png[/IMG]

And the originals prior to sub-editing and space restrictions:

[IMG]http://s2d4.turboimagehost.com/t1/6266779_ww1.png[/IMG] [IMG]http://s2d4.turboimagehost.com/t1/6266781_ww2.png[/IMG] [IMG]http://s2d4.turboimagehost.com/t1/6266785_ww3.png[/IMG] [IMG]http://s2d4.turboimagehost.com/t1/6266787_ww4.png[/IMG]

[IMG]http://s1d2.turboimagehost.com/t1/6513569_starving1.jpg[/IMG]
Uploaded with TurboImageHost.com


[IMG]http://s1d2.turboimagehost.com/t1/6513571_starving2.jpg[/IMG]
Uploaded with TurboImageHost.com

NOT ONLY IS YOUR SPELLING WRONG, SO IS YOUR ASSERTION: THE SPORT GOES FROM STRENGTH TO STRENGTH, IT'S SATURDAY CIRCULATION IS ON THE UP, AND PAUL CHAPLIN'S SAGACIOUS AND HILARIOUS NEXT PAGE IS BEING SUB-EDITED, AS WE SPEAK, FOR TOMORROW'S EDITION.

AS A REWARD FOR YOUR ENTHUSIASM: PLEASE TAKE A LOOK AT THE ORIGINAL DRAFTS PRIOR TO THEIR FINAL SUB-EDITING.

NO GHOST-WRITING HERE, IT'S ALL FROM THE MAN HIMSELF!

WEEK 8 IS OUT TOMORROW. SHALL I EMAIL YOU A COPY?



[IMG]http://s1d3.turboimagehost.com/t1/6673529_a1.png[/IMG] [IMG]http://s1d3.turboimagehost.com/t1/6673530_a2.png[/IMG] [IMG]http://s1d3.turboimagehost.com/t1/6673531_a3.png[/IMG] [IMG]http://s1d3.turboimagehost.com/t1/6673532_a4.png[/IMG] [IMG]http://s1d3.turboimagehost.com/t1/6673533_a5.png[/IMG] [IMG]http://s1d3.turboimagehost.com/t1/6673534_a6.png[/IMG] [IMG]http://s1d3.turboimagehost.com/t1/6673535_a7.png[/IMG]
Uploaded with TurboImageHost.com

"NOT ONLY IS YOUR SPELLING WRONG, SO IS YOUR ASSERTION: THE SPORT GOES FROM STRENGTH TO STRENGTH, IT'S SATURDAY CIRCULATION IS ON THE UP, AND PAUL CHAPLIN'S SAGACIOUS AND HILARIOUS NEXT PAGE IS BEING SUB-EDITED, AS WE SPEAK, FOR TOMORROW'S EDITION. "

What's all this about then?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12942417

Cheers
D

Mister C

Mister C

I suspect BB love it really. Otherwise why rise to it?

David Sullivan gets trashed all these years and not once has he ever come on here and responded.

I think thats how the pros deal with it. They should be too big to get drawn into squabbles.

I don't agree with all of it being envy but maybe based on the arrogance BB have exuded in the past with their threats of legal action and comments typical of the one above.

However I do agree that it is a very british thing to beat down anyone doing well but not in this case.

I personally have no issue with them and if envy of successful companies was the case then why is it Killergram, Playboy and Harmony never come under attack in the same way in this forum?

Some complaints are genuine and their response over time has set a precedent on how they are viewed by some of the consumers which most of the people here are.

In truth BB have done very questionable things inthe way they have treated people but I wont comment because frankly its none of my business but I can see the points behind some of the posts and I dont think its fair a legitimate gripe should be beat down with the accusation of envy.

THAT IS ONE DEFINITE SCORE DRAW ON THE TYPING, AND YOU WERE CERTAINLY AHEAD OF ME ON THE NEWS!!!

FOR NOW AT LAEST, I RST MY CASE!!