8 UK Successes at AVNs!!

[Dave Wells]

"Dave your talent will attain the rewards it merits! Well done!"

Ha what BULLSHIT ! Why isn't this said 'talent' in employ then ?

And what rewards or merits are they then ?

[Rooblue1]

[IMG]http://s2d3.turboimagehost.com/t1/5583208_smutlife.png[/IMG]

source:

[Joe Doe]

If you are the massive talent you claim Dave, why are you pulling pints and not reproducing 'masterpieces' such as Department S?

[s rougier]

I was going to contribute further to this thread, but jamesallan53 has said it all really. So long as Bluebird continues to be run in a wholly disorganised way it will always be a laughing stock, regardless of what material it produces.

[Dave Wells]

That is exactly what I'm asking Joe Doe. Well done for observing and reading it correctly !

Why is the so called and self proclaimed "best" company not using the (probably also self proclaimed but hey somebody has blow my trumpet) best cameraman ??

[Joe Doe]

I've seen BatFxxx Dave and I think its brilliant. Some of the best camerawork I've seen in an adult movie. I'm shocked you did not get the credit that you obviously deserve!!

[oli_cortez]

Bluebird threads always make me laugh as do the rude and ignorant replies you get from them. As a consumer I have never bought or downloaded a bluebird film and never will as the website is horrible to access and their budget is far too big and it takes away what uk porn is all about!

[frankthring]

Perhaps as a director not living in the UK, with no personality issues
with the Bluebird Team, and no special axe to grind, I can say some
hard things...
And I speak with experience, having won several AVN Awards over the
years and directed the first Private feature to win "Best Foreign Movie".
So I am not a novice or bullshitter....
To win heavily at AVN requires that a) your product is new and innovative.
(Brit Porn is still an oddity at AVN, it is thus "fresh" enough to win prizes).
b) Your Company needs to advertise heavily with AVN. Count how many
prizes were picked up by the tiny companies excluding perhaps the fetish
area !! They give out the prizes on the basis of keeping their advertisers
happy !! c) Bribery has also been known to take place ! Not that Mr
Chaplin ever flashes his money around.......!
I have not seen the movies that picked up prizes and hope they are good.
Any British porn feature shot last year has to be an improvement on "St
Trinibums", so excruiatingly embarrassing I almost changed my
nationality to disown it !
So, in that sense, best of luck to Bluebird. They have created a house
style of big tits that is their own. I remain convinced that money spent
with AVN on advertising, along with being relatively New Kids on the US
Block, played as much a share as any creative abilities exhibited by their
releases.

[Dave Wells]

I didn't shoot that one. I'd been mysteriously dumped before it went into production !

[Alex L]

Bill Wright said:

"I remain convinced that money spent with AVN on advertising, along with
being relatively New Kids on the US Block, played as much a share as any creative abilities exhibited by their releases."

As a legend who has directed some seriously arousing porn, it would be very interesting to see what you think of this after watching it, as I think the above is the definative statement on this matter.

Because of all the various posts and comments with a lot of negativity and as a humble supplier, I thought I would check it out and my opinion is, it's a mess.

An (unsuccessful)attempt to create a Batman movie takes precedence over the sexual content, apart from the odd glimpse by way of high lights, all of the crucial action is either in dull, flat lighting or complete shadow!

I have noticed more and more recently that people seem to know how to light a background ok and that's about it. This film comes firmly in that category

Anyway, don't suppose it counts for much but that's my two-penneth.