egafd.com

Eh!

Forget Annabelles and get yer arse down to Stringfellows.

Mind you, if a lady wants to shave, I for one won't argue as I shave my head everyday and wouldnt be seen with hair. I would probably be shocked to discover IF I tried growing it back, it would be grey and receeding. Sod that!! Mind you Marcus looks cool with his (lack of it) hair.

...sorry: I have a prior appointment for some root-canal, and a turpentine enema.

Your own oft-repeated argument about some of the current crop of new girls provides far more striking examples of females altering their secondary sexual characteristics possibly to the detriment of their 'biological allure' (for want of a better term). I doubt that, given the presence of many other visual and chemical stimuli, the absence or reduction of pubic hair would have much of an effect on a male's interest either way. And the continuing trend in evolution seems to be one of gradual hair-loss in the hominid line, which rather bodes ill for the species if your assumption is correct !!
I agree that visual triggers are important across the biological board: but on the other hand I haven't seen any evidence to suggest that pubic hair is a VISUAL stimulus......
BTW, all peacocks are, necessarily, male.

Not the same one I'm thinking of, Sunderland?

the less u have to shave, the less unsightly shaving rash. yukkkkk!!!

Err...No.

Eh!

Oh !
What is this? The Teletubbies?
I'll be Dipsy, then.........