Page 3 of 4

Re: Brazilian Waxes - OT?

Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2003 2:06 pm
by Lizard
Eh!

Re: Brazilian Waxes - OT?

Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2003 2:14 pm
by Peter Stringfellow
Forget Annabelles and get yer arse down to Stringfellows.

Re: Brazilian Waxes - OT?

Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2003 2:21 pm
by Ace
Mind you, if a lady wants to shave, I for one won't argue as I shave my head everyday and wouldnt be seen with hair. I would probably be shocked to discover IF I tried growing it back, it would be grey and receeding. Sod that!! Mind you Marcus looks cool with his (lack of it) hair.

Re: Brazilian Waxes - OT?

Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2003 3:10 pm
by jj
...sorry: I have a prior appointment for some root-canal, and a turpentine enema.

Re: Brazilian Waxes - OT?

Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2003 3:21 pm
by jj
Your own oft-repeated argument about some of the current crop of new girls provides far more striking examples of females altering their secondary sexual characteristics possibly to the detriment of their 'biological allure' (for want of a better term). I doubt that, given the presence of many other visual and chemical stimuli, the absence or reduction of pubic hair would have much of an effect on a male's interest either way. And the continuing trend in evolution seems to be one of gradual hair-loss in the hominid line, which rather bodes ill for the species if your assumption is correct !!
I agree that visual triggers are important across the biological board: but on the other hand I haven't seen any evidence to suggest that pubic hair is a VISUAL stimulus......
BTW, all peacocks are, necessarily, male.

Re: Annabel's?

Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2003 5:04 pm
by Uglygitkev
Not the same one I'm thinking of, Sunderland?

Re: Brazilian Waxes - OT?

Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2003 5:58 pm
by sandie
the less u have to shave, the less unsightly shaving rash. yukkkkk!!!

Re: Annabel's?

Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2003 6:14 pm
by jj
Err...No.

Re: Brazilian Waxes - OT?

Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2003 7:05 pm
by Lizard
Eh!

Re: Brazilian Waxes - OT?

Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2003 7:43 pm
by jj
Oh !
What is this? The Teletubbies?
I'll be Dipsy, then.........