Page 3 of 3

Re: Warning Girls FAKE SHOOT

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 8:44 am
by randyandy
CandiceParis wrote:


> Talent (male & female) should really only work with Producers
> that have a track record & can provide a reference from a Model
> &/or a fellow producer.
>

Sorry Ben but I completely disagree.

Surely the emphasis should be on the model knowing how to work in the industry?

No certs and the get out it was OK coz it was protected??

Not defending the chancer in anyway, who should and I hope if caught will get his balls cut off and have massive sympathy for the gullible model but there appears to be very few steps taken which aren't exactly rocket science.

To then attempt to close the door for newbies because of that doesn't seem right.


Re: Warning Girls FAKE SHOOT

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 1:34 pm
by Tim Jenssen
I think it's good that you brought this out in the open to warn others. The situation could have been much worse.

Re: Warning Girls FAKE SHOOT

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 8:02 pm
by Harry Hardon
Paige - do you mean yuo didn't get paid or it wasn't a shoot. Unclear but from the sounds of it,he didn't pay up front.

Rule 1. Always get the moment before getting naked,


Re: Warning Girls FAKE SHOOT

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 8:13 pm
by Daphne
i agree with randy

im a new producer so for me its hard to get references unless ive booked a model but if you state she shud only work with me if im proven the ndoesnt give new talented producers hope of getting models/work

models need to always ask money up front or at least half