egafd.com

NO
Have never seen a boob job that looked good, ever. Complete turn off.

But, hey if someone wishes to alter what they were given then thats there business, live and let live. I just don`t wanna look at em.

It's quite simple - enhanced boobs can be done very nicely, with the implant under the muscle so the surface stills feels soft and natural, and the shape doesn't become artificially rounded, and the boobs don't become placed unnaturally far apart.

I've shot with two models recently whose boobs are so well done (and with minimal or completely hidden scarring), that I didn't realise at first they were enhanced at all.

So - if you want to get them done, get them done, but nicely...

Generally no simply because they are not like this.

Hi,

Err, not a yes or a no, I'm afraid.

From a photographic/production point of view, this question doesnt make sense to me. From a man in the street do you like tall/short girls, blond/brunette girls, very thin/fat, boob job/non-boob job etc etc it does make some kind of sense.

I have shot models who do not appear to me to have boob jobs, models who appear to me to have boob jobs, models who have told me they have had a boob job but I never guessed etc etc.

I'm sorry but to take the view that you only shoot girls who have not had boob jobs, seems to me to suggest that you have a very rigid view about how women you want to shoot should look. A bit like fashion houses only wanting models above 5ft 9in. and size zero. This is the prerogative of the person paying the dosh I guess.

But surely, who you decide to shoot is going to be based on the look/feel that you are trying to achieve? And unless you want to shoot a similar feel over and over again, the look of the model that you book will vary. I am not saying there is anything wrong with having a similar feel or style, only that I suspect a lot of photographers/producers go for different feels/looks depending on what they want to shoot.

So if you were doing some girl next door/barely legal type shoot you would probably want the model to look completely natural whether they have had a boob job or not. If you were going to shoot maybe something a bit more extreme, fetishistic then you might not be bothered whether the model looked completely natural i.e. obvious boob job, collagen lip implants etc etc.

My main fear would be if models started saying they would only work with photographers that didnt look like a sack of spanners - the case with me and most of the photographers I have met, lol! If that started to be the case, where's that plastic surgeon now?

CHeers
David

Hi

Mine are uplifted and today should have been done again.

Just love to suck hard implnated tits.

I have known several girls who had boob jobs,and even paid for a couple of them.The problems often come later on,when they have left the business and wish to return to 'normal' ,whatever that is.This second lot of surgery often costs a good bit,leaving scars,and self esteem often dives.One has to wonder how these boobs would look,if not readjusted,when a lady reaches (say) 60 years of age.Do they still point towards the ceiling,when she's lying on her back?

On balance,those girls with big natural boobs,seem better adjusted,emotionally,in the long term.However that's just my own opinion!

I would prefer any size natural boobs over fake any day. But then I also don't like tatts or piercings.

So I guess my answer to the question: Fake tits - yes or no?

No

Why would a girl have to pay for her own boob job?

A: YES everytime. Nothing more can remind us of our own sad mortality that droopy pair of funbags heading south.

A quick tally up so far:

Yes = 7
No = 14
Unsure = 5

But I made a mistake which forum I posted this in, I should have put it in the general forum as the customer or the 'end user' as I like to call em may not even see this thread and their opinion is pretty important to the topic.

But this is a great snapshot of opinions so far - keep your choices coming.

Cheers
SimonD