Page 3 of 5

Re: Not Porn

Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 5:40 pm
by bigAl
...Porn...glamour...? Some people would undoubtedly argue that these images are pornographic. Others will dismiss them as 'soft'.

But they have artistic merit, and what can't be seen often goes to create a far more erotic end result than having everything on show.

You should have no hestitation in posting more of them!


Re: Not Porn

Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 6:13 pm
by The Toybox
GR Henry - newstudiob.com would seem to be the only game in town other than searching for US-based sites by the look of it. I certainly don't have anything along those lines.


Re: Not Porn (Attn. of Robin)

Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 4:23 pm
by Robin uk
Yes.

Robin.

Re: Not Porn (Attn. of Robin)

Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 5:02 pm
by The Toybox
They're...like...unpaid.

Unless a lovely porn lady has done a particularly wonderful session and wants pics to send home to her mum. Or MySpace.