Page 3 of 3

Re: Fantasmotron 5

Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 3:24 pm
by jj
alec wrote:
Therefore I
> would say keep them apart unless proved beyond doubt that they
> are the same. However, I haven't studied all the pictures yet;
> so this is just theory.

2000 years of methodology defeated by a mod. Next, you'll be burning
libraries....
But, yes, I know what you mean. Although I could point out other
apparent conflations that I have so far let pass without comment, in
order to give you at least a weekend's respite :- ))


Re: Fantasmotron 5

Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 3:27 pm
by jj
Tch.
And I did that big funny answer before I read THIS one. Tch.

"I remember reading that ears were good for ID - I think it was in a Dick
Francis novel. :)"
For horses, possibly.


Re: Fantasmotron 5

Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:50 am
by alec
I think it was on the basis that ears (and the backs of hands - so not for horses) were difficult to disguise.

Re: Fantasmotron 5

Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 1:23 pm
by jj
Not for Shergar, they won't :- ))


Re: Fantasmotron 5

Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 4:36 am
by lim
Everything has been said about it and the debate is over now.

May I just add that Kate in "Fantasmotron 5" wears the same necklace as A. Castan in "L'ascenseur", and at least two very recognizable rings that can also be seen on S. Simoni's fingers in "Kolbenfresser... Vollgas in den Arsch".

Once again, what a great job, jj !!


Re: Fantasmotron 5

Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 5:05 pm
by jj
Looks like I've finally won :- )))))))))))))))))))))))))))).

Howver, I'd addend the "pierced....", etc. perhaps with "in her later scenes"
to clarify things.